[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd an
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:41:39 -0400 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 03:03:10PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi,
>
> I'm continuing the work done last year to add a new format of
> migration stream that can be used to migrate large guests to a single
> file in a performant way.
>
> This is an early RFC with the previous code + my additions to support
> multifd and direct IO. Let me know what you think!
>
> Here are the reference links for previous discussions:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-08/msg01813.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-10/msg01338.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-10/msg05536.html
>
> The series has 4 main parts:
>
> 1) File migration: A new "file:" migration URI. So "file:mig" does the
> same as "exec:cat > mig". Patches 1-4 implement this;
>
> 2) Fixed-ram format: A new format for the migration stream. Puts guest
> pages at their relative offsets in the migration file. This saves
> space on the worst case of RAM utilization because every page has a
> fixed offset in the migration file and (potentially) saves us time
> because we could write pages independently in parallel. It also
> gives alignment guarantees so we could use O_DIRECT. Patches 5-13
> implement this;
>
> With patches 1-13 these two^ can be used with:
>
> (qemu) migrate_set_capability fixed-ram on
> (qemu) migrate[_incoming] file:mig
Have you considered enabling the new fixed-ram format with postcopy when
loading?
Due to the linear offseting of pages, I think it can achieve super fast vm
loads due to O(1) lookup of pages and local page fault resolutions.
>
> --> new in this series:
>
> 3) MultiFD support: This is about making use of the parallelism
> allowed by the new format. We just need the threading and page
> queuing infrastructure that is already in place for
> multifd. Patches 14-24 implement this;
>
> (qemu) migrate_set_capability fixed-ram on
> (qemu) migrate_set_capability multifd on
> (qemu) migrate_set_parameter multifd-channels 4
> (qemu) migrate_set_parameter max-bandwith 0
> (qemu) migrate[_incoming] file:mig
>
> 4) Add a new "direct_io" parameter and enable O_DIRECT for the
> properly aligned segments of the migration (mostly ram). Patch 25.
>
> (qemu) migrate_set_parameter direct-io on
>
> Thanks! Some data below:
> =====
>
> Outgoing migration to file. NVMe disk. XFS filesystem.
>
> - Single migration runs of stopped 32G guest with ~90% RAM usage. Guest
> running `stress-ng --vm 4 --vm-bytes 90% --vm-method all --verify -t
> 10m -v`:
>
> migration type | MB/s | pages/s | ms
> ----------------+------+---------+------
> savevm io_uring | 434 | 102294 | 71473
So I assume this is the non-live migration scenario. Could you explain
what does io_uring mean here?
> file: | 3017 | 855862 | 10301
> fixed-ram | 1982 | 330686 | 15637
> ----------------+------+---------+------
> fixed-ram + multifd + O_DIRECT
> 2 ch. | 5565 | 1500882 | 5576
> 4 ch. | 5735 | 1991549 | 5412
> 8 ch. | 5650 | 1769650 | 5489
> 16 ch. | 6071 | 1832407 | 5114
> 32 ch. | 6147 | 1809588 | 5050
> 64 ch. | 6344 | 1841728 | 4895
> 128 ch. | 6120 | 1915669 | 5085
> ----------------+------+---------+------
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
- [RFC PATCH v1 17/26] migration/multifd: Add outgoing QIOChannelFile support, (continued)
- [RFC PATCH v1 17/26] migration/multifd: Add outgoing QIOChannelFile support, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 19/26] migration/multifd: Add pages to the receiving side, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 18/26] migration/multifd: Add incoming QIOChannelFile support, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 21/26] migration/ram: Add a wrapper for fixed-ram shadow bitmap, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 22/26] migration/multifd: Support outgoing fixed-ram stream format, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 20/26] io: Add a pwritev/preadv version that takes a discontiguous iovec, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 23/26] migration/multifd: Support incoming fixed-ram stream format, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 25/26] migration: Add direct-io parameter, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 24/26] tests/qtest: Add a multifd + fixed-ram migration test, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- [RFC PATCH v1 26/26] tests/migration/guestperf: Add file, fixed-ram and direct-io support, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/30
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram,
Peter Xu <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Peter Xu, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Peter Xu, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Peter Xu, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Fabiano Rosas, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Peter Xu, 2023/03/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] migration: File based migration with multifd and fixed-ram, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2023/03/31