[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH-for-8.0 v2 2/2] target/arm/pauth: Inline pauth_param_mask() a
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH-for-8.0 v2 2/2] target/arm/pauth: Inline pauth_param_mask() and pauth_ptr_mask() |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:43:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
On 3/28/23 06:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 673519a24a..a617466fa8 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1389,6 +1389,14 @@ int exception_target_el(CPUARMState *env);
bool arm_singlestep_active(CPUARMState *env);
bool arm_generate_debug_exceptions(CPUARMState *env);
+static inline uint64_t pauth_param_mask(ARMVAParameters param)
Perhaps pauth_ptr_mask_param, or just pauth_ptr_mask (see below).
+static inline uint64_t pauth_ptr_mask(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t ptr, bool
data)
+{
+ ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx = arm_stage1_mmu_idx(env);
+ ARMVAParameters param = aa64_va_parameters(env, ptr, mmu_idx, data);
+
+ return pauth_param_mask(param);
+}
This is only used by gdbstub. Just put it there. Perhaps merge it with
aarch64_gdb_get_pauth_reg directly, so that we can use the simpler 'pauth_ptr_mask' name
above.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~