[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v15 4/4] vhost-vdpa: Add support for vIOMMU.
|
From: |
Cindy Lu |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v15 4/4] vhost-vdpa: Add support for vIOMMU. |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:59:48 +0800 |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:41 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:47 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:24 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The vIOMMU support will make vDPA can work in IOMMU mode. This
> > > > will fix security issues while using the no-IOMMU mode.
> > > > To support this feature we need to add new functions for IOMMU MR adds
> > > > and
> > > > deletes.
> > > >
> > > > Also since the SVQ does not support vIOMMU yet, add the check for IOMMU
> > > > in vhost_vdpa_dev_start, if the SVQ and IOMMU enable at the same time
> > > > the function will return fail.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Skip the iova_max check vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(). While
> > > > MR is IOMMU, move this check to vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify()
> > > >
> > > > Verified in vp_vdpa and vdpa_sim_net driver
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/virtio/trace-events | 2 +-
> > > > hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h | 11 +++
> > > > 3 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/trace-events b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > > index 8f8d05cf9b..de4da2c65c 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ vhost_user_create_notifier(int idx, void *n) "idx:%d
> > > > n:%p"
> > > > vhost_vdpa_dma_map(void *vdpa, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint32_t
> > > > asid, uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint64_t uaddr, uint8_t perm,
> > > > uint8_t type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" asid: %"PRIu32" iova:
> > > > 0x%"PRIx64" size: 0x%"PRIx64" uaddr: 0x%"PRIx64" perm: 0x%"PRIx8" type:
> > > > %"PRIu8
> > > > vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(void *vdpa, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint32_t
> > > > asid, uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint8_t type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d
> > > > msg_type: %"PRIu32" asid: %"PRIu32" iova: 0x%"PRIx64" size: 0x%"PRIx64"
> > > > type: %"PRIu8
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_begin_batch(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type,
> > > > uint8_t type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> > > > -vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type, uint8_t
> > > > type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> > > > +vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(void *v, int fd, uint32_t msg_type,
> > > > uint8_t type) "vdpa:%p fd: %d msg_type: %"PRIu32" type: %"PRIu8
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(void *vdpa, uint64_t iova, uint64_t
> > > > llend, void *vaddr, bool readonly) "vdpa: %p iova 0x%"PRIx64" llend
> > > > 0x%"PRIx64" vaddr: %p read-only: %d"
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_region_del(void *vdpa, uint64_t iova, uint64_t
> > > > llend) "vdpa: %p iova 0x%"PRIx64" llend 0x%"PRIx64
> > > > vhost_vdpa_add_status(void *dev, uint8_t status) "dev: %p status:
> > > > 0x%"PRIx8
> > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > > index 0c8c37e786..39720d12a6 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > > > #include "cpu.h"
> > > > #include "trace.h"
> > > > #include "qapi/error.h"
> > > > +#include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Return one past the end of the end of section. Be careful with
> > > > uint64_t
> > > > @@ -60,13 +61,21 @@ static bool
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
> > > > iova_min, section->offset_within_address_space);
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * While using vIOMMU, sometimes the section will be larger than
> > > > iova_max,
> > > > + * but the memory that actually maps is smaller, so move the check
> > > > to
> > > > + * function vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify(). That function will use
> > > > the actual
> > > > + * size that maps to the kernel
> > > > + */
> > > >
> > > > - llend = vhost_vdpa_section_end(section);
> > > > - if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(iova_max))) {
> > > > - error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> > > > - ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> > > > - iova_max, int128_get64(llend));
> > > > - return true;
> > > > + if (!memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> > > > + llend = vhost_vdpa_section_end(section);
> > > > + if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(iova_max))) {
> > > > + error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%"
> > > > PRIx64
> > > > + ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> > > > + iova_max, int128_get64(llend));
> > > > + return true;
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return false;
> > > > @@ -158,9 +167,8 @@ static void
> > > > vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
> > > > v->iotlb_batch_begin_sent = true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> > > > +static void vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> > > > listener);
> > > > struct vhost_dev *dev = v->dev;
> > > > struct vhost_msg_v2 msg = {};
> > > > int fd = v->device_fd;
> > > > @@ -176,7 +184,7 @@ static void
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> > > > msg.type = v->msg_type;
> > > > msg.iotlb.type = VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END;
> > > >
> > > > - trace_vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(v, fd, msg.type, msg.iotlb.type);
> > > > + trace_vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v, fd, msg.type,
> > > > msg.iotlb.type);
> > >
> > > I suggest to keep the commit trace. The commit and batch are different
> > > things. If you want to trace the batch begin/end you should do it in
> > > vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once() etc.
> > >
> > sure will fix this
> > > > if (write(fd, &msg, sizeof(msg)) != sizeof(msg)) {
> > > > error_report("failed to write, fd=%d, errno=%d (%s)",
> > > > fd, errno, strerror(errno));
> > > > @@ -185,6 +193,124 @@ static void
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> > > > v->iotlb_batch_begin_sent = false;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> > > > listener);
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n,
> > > > IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu = container_of(n, struct vdpa_iommu, n);
> > > > +
> > > > + hwaddr iova = iotlb->iova + iommu->iommu_offset;
> > > > + struct vhost_vdpa *v = iommu->dev;
> > > > + void *vaddr;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + Int128 llend;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (iotlb->target_as != &address_space_memory) {
> > > > + error_report("Wrong target AS \"%s\", only system memory is
> > > > allowed",
> > > > + iotlb->target_as->name ? iotlb->target_as->name :
> > > > "none");
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > + RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();
> > > > + /* check if RAM section out of device range */
> > > > + llend = int128_add(int128_makes64(iotlb->addr_mask),
> > > > int128_makes64(iova));
> > > > + if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(v->iova_range.last))) {
> > > > + error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> > > > + ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> > > > + v->iova_range.last, int128_get64(llend));
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if ((iotlb->perm & IOMMU_RW) != IOMMU_NONE) {
> > > > + bool read_only;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!memory_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only,
> > > > NULL)) {
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(v);
> > >
> > > I think at most 2 ioctls for this, is this still worth to batch them?
> > >
> > > Other looks good.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > the kernel vdpa doesn't support no-batch mode, if we remove the batch here
> > the system will fail to map
> > qemu-system-x86_64: failed to write, fd=12, errno=14 (Bad address)
> > qemu-system-x86_64: vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(0x7f811a950190, 0x0,
> > 0x80000000) = -5 (Bad address)
> >
> > I'm not sure maybe this is a bug in the kernel?
>
> I'm not sure I understand this, but do you mean you meet this if you
> remove the batch_begin_once() and vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once()?
>
> Thanks
>
yes， the system will fail to map if we remove these functions, Does
this work as expect?
Maybe we need to fix this in the kernel?
Thanks
Cindy
> > Thanks
> > Cindy
> >
> > > > + ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_map(v, VHOST_VDPA_GUEST_PA_ASID, iova,
> > > > + iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr,
> > > > read_only);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_map(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", "
> > > > + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", %p) = %d (%m)",
> > > > + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr, ret);
> > > > + }
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(v);
> > > > + ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(v, VHOST_VDPA_GUEST_PA_ASID, iova,
> > > > + iotlb->addr_mask + 1);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ",
> > > > "
> > > > + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ") = %d (%m)",
> > > > + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, ret);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_end_once(v);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > > + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> > > > listener);
> > > > +
> > > > + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> > > > + Int128 end;
> > > > + int iommu_idx;
> > > > + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + iommu_mr = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION(section->mr);
> > > > +
> > > > + iommu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*iommu));
> > > > + end = int128_add(int128_make64(section->offset_within_region),
> > > > + section->size);
> > > > + end = int128_sub(end, int128_one());
> > > > + iommu_idx = memory_region_iommu_attrs_to_index(iommu_mr,
> > > > +
> > > > MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> > > > + iommu->iommu_mr = iommu_mr;
> > > > + iommu_notifier_init(&iommu->n, vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify,
> > > > + IOMMU_NOTIFIER_IOTLB_EVENTS,
> > > > + section->offset_within_region,
> > > > + int128_get64(end),
> > > > + iommu_idx);
> > > > + iommu->iommu_offset = section->offset_within_address_space -
> > > > + section->offset_within_region;
> > > > + iommu->dev = v;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(section->mr,
> > > > &iommu->n, NULL);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + g_free(iommu);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&v->iommu_list, iommu, iommu_next);
> > > > + memory_region_iommu_replay(iommu->iommu_mr, &iommu->n);
> > > > +
> > > > + return;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > > + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa,
> > > > listener);
> > > > +
> > > > + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> > > > +
> > > > + QLIST_FOREACH(iommu, &v->iommu_list, iommu_next)
> > > > + {
> > > > + if (MEMORY_REGION(iommu->iommu_mr) == section->mr &&
> > > > + iommu->n.start == section->offset_within_region) {
> > > > + memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier(section->mr,
> > > > &iommu->n);
> > > > + QLIST_REMOVE(iommu, iommu_next);
> > > > + g_free(iommu);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > > MemoryRegionSection
> > > > *section)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -199,6 +325,10 @@ static void
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > > v->iova_range.last)) {
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > > + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(listener, section);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space &
> > > > ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) !=
> > > > (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)))
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -278,6 +408,9 @@ static void
> > > > vhost_vdpa_listener_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > > v->iova_range.last)) {
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > > + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> > > > + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(listener, section);
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space &
> > > > ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) !=
> > > > (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)))
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -1182,7 +1315,13 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_dev_start(struct vhost_dev
> > > > *dev, bool started)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (started) {
> > > > - memory_listener_register(&v->listener, &address_space_memory);
> > > > + if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev) && (v->shadow_vqs_enabled)) {
> > > > + error_report("SVQ can not work while IOMMU enable, please
> > > > disable"
> > > > + "IOMMU and try again");
> > > > + return -1;
> > > > + }
> > > > + memory_listener_register(&v->listener, dev->vdev->dma_as);
> > > > +
> > > > return vhost_vdpa_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> > > > b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> > > > index c278a2a8de..e64bfc7f98 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> > > > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ typedef struct vhost_vdpa {
> > > > struct vhost_dev *dev;
> > > > Error *migration_blocker;
> > > > VhostVDPAHostNotifier notifier[VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX];
> > > > + QLIST_HEAD(, vdpa_iommu) iommu_list;
> > > > + IOMMUNotifier n;
> > > > } VhostVDPA;
> > > >
> > > > int vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(int fd, struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range
> > > > *iova_range);
> > > > @@ -61,4 +63,13 @@ int vhost_vdpa_dma_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> > > > uint32_t asid, hwaddr iova,
> > > > int vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v, uint32_t asid, hwaddr
> > > > iova,
> > > > hwaddr size);
> > > >
> > > > +typedef struct vdpa_iommu {
> > > > + struct vhost_vdpa *dev;
> > > > + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> > > > + hwaddr iommu_offset;
> > > > + IOMMUNotifier n;
> > > > + QLIST_ENTRY(vdpa_iommu) iommu_next;
> > > > +} VDPAIOMMUState;
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > #endif
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.3
> > > >
> > >
> >
>