[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx
From: |
Wu, Fei |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:46 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 |
On 3/23/2023 2:00 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
> On 3/23/2023 1:37 PM, LIU Zhiwei wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/3/23 10:44, Fei Wu wrote:
>>> Currently it's assumed the 2 low bits of mmu_idx map to privilege mode,
>>> this assumption won't last as we are about to add more mmu_idx.
>> For patch set has more than 1 patch, usually add a cover letter.
>
> This is cover letter:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg950849.html
>
> I added scripts/get_maintainer.pl to .git/config, it couldn't find out
> the maintainers for the cover letter, so I added the mail lists to "To"
> manually.
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fei Wu <fei2.wu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> target/riscv/cpu.h | 1 -
>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
>>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc | 2 +-
>>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc | 7 +------
>>> target/riscv/translate.c | 3 +++
>>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>> index 638e47c75a..66f7e3d1ba 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>> @@ -623,7 +623,6 @@ G_NORETURN void
>>> riscv_raise_exception(CPURISCVState *env,
>>> target_ulong riscv_cpu_get_fflags(CPURISCVState *env);
>>> void riscv_cpu_set_fflags(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong);
>>> -#define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK 3
>>> #define TB_FLAGS_PRIV_HYP_ACCESS_MASK (1 << 2)
>>> #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS MSTATUS_FS
>>> #define TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_VS MSTATUS_VS
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>> index f88c503cf4..76e1b0100e 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState
>>> *env, hwaddr *physical,
>>> * (riscv_cpu_do_interrupt) is correct */
>>> MemTxResult res;
>>> MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED;
>>> - int mode = mmu_idx & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;
>>> + int mode = env->priv;
>>> bool use_background = false;
>>> hwaddr ppn;
>>> RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>>> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>>> index 59501b2780..9305b18299 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_privileged.c.inc
>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static bool trans_ebreak(DisasContext *ctx,
>>> arg_ebreak *a)
>>> * that no exception will be raised when fetching them.
>>> */
>>> - if (semihosting_enabled(ctx->mem_idx < PRV_S) &&
>>> + if (semihosting_enabled(ctx->priv < PRV_S) &&
>>> (pre_addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (post_addr &
>>> TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
>>> pre = opcode_at(&ctx->base, pre_addr);
>>> ebreak = opcode_at(&ctx->base, ebreak_addr);
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>>> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>>> index df504c3f2c..adfb53cb4c 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_xthead.c.inc
>>> @@ -265,12 +265,7 @@ static bool trans_th_tst(DisasContext *ctx,
>>> arg_th_tst *a)
>>> static inline int priv_level(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> {
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>> - return PRV_U;
>>> -#else
>>> - /* Priv level is part of mem_idx. */
>>> - return ctx->mem_idx & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;
>>> -#endif
>>> + return ctx->priv;
>>> }
>>> /* Test if priv level is M, S, or U (cannot fail). */
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
>>> index 0ee8ee147d..e8880f9423 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/translate.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
>>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
>>> uint32_t mstatus_hs_fs;
>>> uint32_t mstatus_hs_vs;
>>> uint32_t mem_idx;
>>> + uint32_t priv;
>>> /* Remember the rounding mode encoded in the previous fp
>>> instruction,
>>> which we have already installed into env->fp_status. Or -1 for
>>> no previous fp instruction. Note that we exit the TB when
>>> writing
>>> @@ -1162,8 +1163,10 @@ static void
>>> riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
>>> } else {
>>> ctx->virt_enabled = false;
>>> }
>>> + ctx->priv = env->priv;
>>
>> This is not right. You should put env->priv into tb flags before you use
>> it in translation.
>>
> I see some other env usages in this function, when will env->priv and
> tb_flags.priv mismatch (assume we have recorded priv in tb_flags)?
>
I looks that they are from the same source.
cpu_exec_loop
cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(cpu->env_ptr, &pc, &cs_base, &flags);
flags |= cpu_mmu_index(env, 0); // <-- generate flags from env
tb = tb_gen_code(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags, cflags);
tb->flags = flags;
setjmp_gen_code(env, tb, pc, host_pc, &max_insns, &ti);
gen_intermediate_code(env_cpu(env), tb, max_insns, pc, host_pc);
DisasContext dc;
translator_loop(cpu, tb, ..., &dc.base);
ops->init_disas_context(db, cpu); // riscv_tr_
ctx->mem_idx = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, MEM_IDX);
tcg_gen_code(tcg_ctx, tb, pc);
Thanks,
Fei.
> Thanks,
> Fei.
>
>> Zhiwei
>>
>>> #else
>>> ctx->virt_enabled = false;
>>> + ctx->priv = PRV_U;
>>> #endif
>>> ctx->misa_ext = env->misa_ext;
>>> ctx->frm = -1; /* unknown rounding mode */
>
- [PATCH v4 0/2] target/riscv: reduce MSTATUS_SUM overhead, Fei Wu, 2023/03/22
- [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Fei Wu, 2023/03/22
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx,
Wu, Fei <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/24
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Wu, Fei, 2023/03/23
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/riscv: separate priv from mmu_idx, Richard Henderson, 2023/03/23