Re: [PATCH v16 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology

[Thomas Huth]

On 27/02/2023 15.17, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 2/27/23 14:58, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 22/02/2023 15.21, Pierre Morel wrote:
> > > Add some basic examples for the definition of cpu topology
> > > in s390x.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst | 378 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   docs/system/target-s390x.rst       |   1 +
> > >   2 files changed, 379 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst
> > >
> > > diff --git a/docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst 
> > > b/docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..d470e28b97
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/docs/system/s390x/cpu-topology.rst
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
> > > +CPU topology on s390x
> > > +=====================
> > > +
> > > +Since QEMU 8.0, CPU topology on s390x provides up to 3 levels of
> > > +topology containers: drawers, books, sockets, defining a tree shaped
> > > +hierarchy.
> > > +
> > > +The socket container contains one or more CPU entries consisting
> > > +of a bitmap of three dentical CPU attributes:
> >
> > What do you mean by "dentical" here?
>
> :D i.. dentical
>
> I change it to identical

Ok, but even with "i" at the beginning, it does not make too much sense here 
to me - I'd interpret "identical" as "same", but these attributes have 
clearly different meanings, haven't they?

 Thomas