qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 10/15] vdpa: disable RAM block discard only for the first


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/15] vdpa: disable RAM block discard only for the first device
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:11:06 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0


在 2023/2/24 23:54, Eugenio Pérez 写道:
Although it does not make a big difference, its more correct and
simplifies the cleanup path in subsequent patches.

Move ram_block_discard_disable(false) call to the top of
vhost_vdpa_cleanup because:
* We cannot use vhost_vdpa_first_dev after dev->opaque = NULL
   assignment.
* Improve the stack order in cleanup: since it is the last action taken
   in init, it should be the first at cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
---
  hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
index 71e3dc21fe..27655e7582 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -431,16 +431,6 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void 
*opaque, Error **errp)
      trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
      int ret;
- /*
-     * Similar to VFIO, we end up pinning all guest memory and have to
-     * disable discarding of RAM.
-     */
-    ret = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
-    if (ret) {
-        error_report("Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
-        return ret;
-    }
-
      v = opaque;
      v->dev = dev;
      dev->opaque =  opaque ;
@@ -452,6 +442,16 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void 
*opaque, Error **errp)
          return 0;
      }
+ /*
+     * Similar to VFIO, we end up pinning all guest memory and have to
+     * disable discarding of RAM.
+     */
+    ret = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
+    if (ret) {
+        error_report("Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
+        return ret;
+    }


We seems to lose the chance to free svq allocated by vhost_vdpa_init_svq() in this case?

Thanks


+
      vhost_vdpa_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE |
                                 VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER);
@@ -577,12 +577,15 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
      assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
      v = dev->opaque;
      trace_vhost_vdpa_cleanup(dev, v);
+    if (vhost_vdpa_first_dev(dev)) {
+        ram_block_discard_disable(false);
+    }
+
      vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit(dev, dev->nvqs);
      memory_listener_unregister(&v->listener);
      vhost_vdpa_svq_cleanup(dev);
dev->opaque = NULL;
-    ram_block_discard_disable(false);
return 0;
  }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]