|
| From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 03/25] target/arm: Diagnose incorrect usage of arm_is_secure subroutines |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:39:59 +0100 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
On 22/2/23 03:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure. These functions make no sense for m-profile, and would indicate prior incorrect feature testing. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- target/arm/cpu.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |