[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed way forward Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Python: Drop support for Pyt
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: Proposed way forward Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Python: Drop support for Python 3.6 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:52:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:46:53PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/02/2023 12.37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> ...
> > The long life enterprise distros are the pain point in unlocking the
> > new of python features. So the proposal is that, at a minimum, we
> > augment the current policy with words to the effect that:
> >
> > * For long life cycle distributions, QEMU will follow normal
> > policy for platform level dependancies / native code. For
> > Python modules, QEMU may choose to require a newer versions
> > than are available from the distribution package manager.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. But I think we still should also add a sentence
> where we limit the total amount of time that we promise to support a
> long-term distro. Otherwise we'll also get problems with other way too
> backlevel native code dependencies at one point in time.
Oh sure, having something time related mention makes sense.
> I just sent a patch for discussion, shortly before I noticed your mail here.
> Feel free to grab the ideas from there into your patch (if you're planning
> to send one), or let me know if I should try to include the Python-related
> sentences in mine.
I wasn't planning to imminently send a change. Especially now that
both yourself an Paolo have proposed similar competing additions,
lets just iterate on one of those 2 proposals.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|