qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 7/9] target/riscv: Tracking indirect branche


From: LIU Zhiwei
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 7/9] target/riscv: Tracking indirect branches (fcfi) using TCG
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:55:30 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2


On 2023/2/9 14:24, Deepak Gupta wrote:
zisslpcfi protects forward control flow (if enabled) by enforcing all
indirect call and jmp must land on a landing pad instruction `lpcll`
short for landing pad and check lower label value. If target of an
indirect call or jmp is not `lpcll` then cpu/hart must raise an illegal
instruction exception.

This patch implements the mechanism using TCG. Target architecture branch
instruction must define the end of a TB. Using this property, during
translation of branch instruction, TB flag = FCFI_LP_EXPECTED can be set.
Translation of target TB can check if FCFI_LP_EXPECTED flag is set and a
flag (fcfi_lp_expected) can be set in DisasContext. If `lpcll` gets
translated, fcfi_lp_expected flag in DisasContext can be cleared. Else
it'll fault.

This patch also also adds flag for forward and backward cfi in
DisasContext.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Kip Walker  <kip@rivosinc.com>
---
  target/riscv/cpu.h        |  3 +++
  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 12 +++++++++
  target/riscv/translate.c  | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 8803ea6426..98b272bcad 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -644,6 +644,9 @@ FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VMA, 25, 1)
  /* Native debug itrigger */
  FIELD(TB_FLAGS, ITRIGGER, 26, 1)
+/* Zisslpcfi needs a TB flag to track indirect branches */
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED, 27, 1)
+
  #ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
  #define riscv_cpu_mxl(env)  ((void)(env), MXL_RV32)
  #else
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index 63377abc2f..d15918f534 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -129,6 +129,18 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong 
*pc,
          flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, VILL, 1);
      }
+ if (cpu->cfg.ext_cfi) {
+        /*
+         * For Forward CFI, only the expectation of a lpcll at
+         * the start of the block is tracked (which can only happen
+         * when FCFI is enabled for the current processor mode). A jump
+         * or call at the end of the previous TB will have updated
+         * env->elp to indicate the expectation.
+         */
+        flags = FIELD_DP32(flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED,
+                           env->elp != NO_LP_EXPECTED);
+    }
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
      flags |= TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_FS;
      flags |= TB_FLAGS_MSTATUS_VS;
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index df38db7553..7d43d20fc3 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static TCGv load_val;
  /* globals for PM CSRs */
  static TCGv pm_mask;
  static TCGv pm_base;
+static TCGOp *cfi_lp_check;
#include "exec/gen-icount.h" @@ -116,6 +117,10 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
      bool itrigger;
      /* TCG of the current insn_start */
      TCGOp *insn_start;
+    /* CFI extension */
+    bool bcfi_enabled;
+    bool fcfi_enabled;
+    bool fcfi_lp_expected;
  } DisasContext;
static inline bool has_ext(DisasContext *ctx, uint32_t ext)
@@ -1166,11 +1171,44 @@ static void 
riscv_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
      ctx->pm_mask_enabled = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, PM_MASK_ENABLED);
      ctx->pm_base_enabled = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, PM_BASE_ENABLED);
      ctx->itrigger = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, ITRIGGER);
+    ctx->bcfi_enabled = cpu_get_bcfien(env);
+    ctx->fcfi_enabled = cpu_get_fcfien(env);
This is wrong.  If you ctx->bcfi_enabled in the translation and don't put it in a tb flags field, the translated tb will
be misused.


Zhiwei

+    ctx->fcfi_lp_expected = FIELD_EX32(tb_flags, TB_FLAGS, FCFI_LP_EXPECTED);
      ctx->zero = tcg_constant_tl(0);
  }
static void riscv_tr_tb_start(DisasContextBase *db, CPUState *cpu)
  {
+    DisasContext *ctx = container_of(db, DisasContext, base);
+
+    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
+        /*
+         * Since we can't look ahead to confirm that the first
+         * instruction is a legal landing pad instruction, emit
+         * compare-and-branch sequence that will be fixed-up in
+         * riscv_tr_tb_stop() to either statically hit or skip an
+         * illegal instruction exception depending on whether the
+         * flag was lowered by translation of a CJLP or JLP as
+         * the first instruction in the block.
+         */
+        TCGv_i32 immediate;
+        TCGLabel *l;
+        l = gen_new_label();
+        immediate = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
+        tcg_gen_movi_i32(immediate, 0);
+        cfi_lp_check = tcg_last_op();
+        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, immediate, 0, l);
+        tcg_temp_free_i32(immediate);
+        gen_exception_illegal(ctx);
+        gen_set_label(l);
+        /*
+         * Despite the use of gen_exception_illegal(), the rest of
+         * the TB needs to be generated. The TCG optimizer will
+         * clean things up depending on which path ends up being
+         * active.
+         */
+        ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NEXT;
+    }
  }
static void riscv_tr_insn_start(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
@@ -1225,6 +1263,7 @@ static void riscv_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase 
*dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
  static void riscv_tr_tb_stop(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
  {
      DisasContext *ctx = container_of(dcbase, DisasContext, base);
+    CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr;
switch (ctx->base.is_jmp) {
      case DISAS_TOO_MANY:
@@ -1235,6 +1274,19 @@ static void riscv_tr_tb_stop(DisasContextBase *dcbase, 
CPUState *cpu)
      default:
          g_assert_not_reached();
      }
+
+    if (ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
+        /*
+         * If the "lp expected" flag is still up, the block needs to take an
+         * illegal instruction exception.
+         */
+        tcg_set_insn_param(cfi_lp_check, 1, tcgv_i32_arg(tcg_constant_i32(1)));
+    } else {
+        /*
+        * LP instruction requirement was met, clear up LP expected
+        */
+        env->elp = NO_LP_EXPECTED;
+    }
  }
static void riscv_tr_disas_log(const DisasContextBase *dcbase,



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]