ENABLED -> PWRONLY transition is not allowed and we handle it by
shpc_invalid_command(). But PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition is silently
ignored, which seems wrong. Let's handle it as correct.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
---
hw/pci/shpc.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pci/shpc.c b/hw/pci/shpc.c
index 5d71569b13..25e4172382 100644
--- a/hw/pci/shpc.c
+++ b/hw/pci/shpc.c
@@ -273,28 +273,22 @@ static void shpc_slot_command(SHPCDevice *shpc, uint8_t
target,
return;
}
- switch (power) {
- case SHPC_LED_NO:
- break;
- default:
+ if (power != SHPC_LED_NO) {
/* TODO: send event to monitor */
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, power, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
}
- switch (attn) {
- case SHPC_LED_NO:
- break;
- default:
+ if (attn != SHPC_LED_NO) {
/* TODO: send event to monitor */
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, attn, SHPC_SLOT_ATTN_LED_MASK);
}
-
- if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY)
||
- (current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED))
{
- shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
- } else if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
- current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
- state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED) {
+ if (state != SHPC_STATE_NO) {
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
+ }
+
+ if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
+ current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
+ state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED)
+ {
power = shpc_get_status(shpc, slot, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
/* TODO: track what monitor requested. */
/* Look at LED to figure out whether it's ok to remove the device. */