[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vhost: accept VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM as a valid SVQ feature
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vhost: accept VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM as a valid SVQ feature |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:31:00 +0800 |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:19 AM Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM indicates that memory accesses by the driver and
> the device are ordered in a way described by the platform. Since vDPA
> devices may be backed by a hardware devices, let's allow
> VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> index 4307296358..6bb1998f12 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ bool vhost_svq_valid_features(uint64_t features, Error
> **errp)
> switch (b) {
> case VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT:
> case VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX:
> + case VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM:
Do we need to add this bit to vdpa_feature_bits[] as well?
Thanks
> continue;
>
> case VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM:
> --
> 2.31.1
>