[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: disable FEAT_SME if we turn off SVE
From: |
Fabiano Rosas |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: disable FEAT_SME if we turn off SVE |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:45:20 -0300 |
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
> Before this change booting a -cpu max,sve=off would trigger and
> assert:
>
> qemu-system-aarch64: ../../target/arm/helper.c:6647: sve_vqm1_for_el_sm:
> Assertion `sm' failed.
>
> when the guest attempts to write to SMCR which shouldn't even exist if
> SVE has been turned off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/cpu64.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> index 0e021960fb..a38d43421a 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,13 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, bool value,
> Error **errp)
> t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0;
> t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, value);
> cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = t;
> +
> + /* FEAT_SME requires SVE, so disable it if no SVE */
> + if (!value) {
> + t = cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1;
> + t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, SME, 0);
> + cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 = t;
> + }
What about -cpu max,sve=off,sme=on ?