qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 8/9] hw/intc/armv7m_nvic: Allow calling neg_prio_requested on unr


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] hw/intc/armv7m_nvic: Allow calling neg_prio_requested on unrealized NVIC
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:17:13 +0100

armv7m_nvic_neg_prio_requested() is called via arm_cpu_reset_hold()
during CPU realize() time, when the NVIC isn't yet realized:

(lldb) bt
  * frame #0:  0x10059ed5c armv7m_nvic_neg_prio_requested(opaque=0x1180087b0, 
secure=true) at armv7m_nvic.c:404:9
    frame #1:  0x100383018 arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate [inlined] 
arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv(...) at m_helper.c:2882:19
    frame #2:  0x10038300c arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate(..., secstate=true) at 
m_helper.c:2893:12
    frame #3:  0x10036e9bc arm_mmu_idx_el(...) at helper.c:11799:16 [artificial]
    frame #4:  0x100366cd4 arm_rebuild_hflags [inlined] 
rebuild_hflags_internal(env=0x118411f30) at helper.c:12129:25
    frame #5:  0x100366c18 arm_rebuild_hflags(env=0x118411f30) at 
helper.c:12142:19
    frame #6:  0x10035f1c4 arm_cpu_reset_hold(...) at cpu.c:541:5 [artificial]
    frame #7:  0x10066b354 resettable_phase_hold(obj=0x118410000, 
opaque=0x000000000, ...) at resettable.c:0
    frame #8:  0x10066ac40 resettable_assert_reset(obj=0x118410000, ...) at 
resettable.c:60:5
    frame #9:  0x10066ab1c resettable_reset(obj=0x118410000, 
type=RESET_TYPE_COLD) at resettable.c:45:5
    frame #10: 0x100669568 device_cold_reset(...) at qdev.c:255:5 [artificial]
    frame #11: 0x10000ca28 cpu_reset(cpu=0x118410000) at cpu-common.c:114:5
    frame #12: 0x10035ec74 arm_cpu_realizefn(dev=0x118410000, errp=0x16fdfb910) 
at cpu.c:2145:5
    frame #13: 0x10066a3e0 device_set_realized(...) at qdev.c:519:13
    frame #14: 0x100671b98 property_set_bool(obj=0x118410000, ...) at 
object.c:2285:5
    frame #15: 0x10066fdf4 object_property_set(obj=0x118410000, 
name="realized", ...) at object.c:1420:5
    frame #16: 0x100673da8 object_property_set_qobject(...) at 
qom-qobject.c:28:10
    frame #17: 0x10067026c object_property_set_bool(...) at object.c:1489:15
    frame #18: 0x100669600 qdev_realize(...) at qdev.c:292:12 [artificial]
    frame #19: 0x1003101bc armv7m_realize(dev=0x118008480, ...) at 
armv7m.c:344:10
    frame #20: 0x10066a3e0 device_set_realized(...) at qdev.c:519:13
    frame #21: 0x100671b98 property_set_bool(obj=0x118008480, ...) at 
object.c:2285:5
    frame #22: 0x10066fdf4 object_property_set(obj=0x118008480, 
name="realized", ...) at object.c:1420:5
    frame #23: 0x100673da8 object_property_set_qobject(...) at 
qom-qobject.c:28:10
    frame #24: 0x10067026c object_property_set_bool(...) at object.c:1489:15
    frame #25: 0x100669600 qdev_realize(...) at qdev.c:292:12 [artificial]
    frame #26: 0x100092da8 sysbus_realize(...) at sysbus.c:256:12 [artificial]
    frame #27: 0x100350e1c armsse_realize(dev=0x118008150, ...) at 
armsse.c:1043:14
    frame #28: 0x10066a3e0 device_set_realized(...) at qdev.c:519:13
    frame #29: 0x100671b98 property_set_bool(obj=0x118008150, ...) at 
object.c:2285:5
    frame #30: 0x10066fdf4 object_property_set(obj=0x118008150, 
name="realized", ...) at object.c:1420:5
    frame #31: 0x100673da8 object_property_set_qobject(...) at 
qom-qobject.c:28:10
    frame #32: 0x10067026c object_property_set_bool(...) at object.c:1489:15
    frame #33: 0x100669600 qdev_realize(...) at qdev.c:292:12 [artificial]
    frame #34: 0x100092da8 sysbus_realize(...) at sysbus.c:256:12 [artificial]
    frame #35: 0x100349354 mps2tz_common_init(machine=0x118008000) at 
mps2-tz.c:834:5
    frame #36: 0x10008e6b8 machine_run_board_init(machine=0x118008000, ...) at 
machine.c:1405:5
(lldb) frame select 12
frame #12: 0x10035ec74 arm_cpu_realizefn(dev=0x118410000, errp=0x16fdfb910) at 
cpu.c:2145:5
   2142     }
   2143
   2144     qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
-> 2145     cpu_reset(cs);
   2146
   2147     acc->parent_realize(dev, errp);
   2148 }

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index e54553283f..d9c7e414bc 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -399,6 +399,11 @@ bool armv7m_nvic_neg_prio_requested(NVICState *s, bool 
secure)
      * mean we don't allow FAULTMASK_NS to actually make the execution
      * priority negative). Compare pseudocode IsReqExcPriNeg().
      */
+
+    if (!DEVICE(s)->realized) { /* XXX Why are we called while not realized? */
+        return false;
+    }
+
     if (s->cpu->env.v7m.faultmask[secure]) {
         return true;
     }
-- 
2.38.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]