qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH] gitlab: call ninja directly and reduce build noise


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gitlab: call ninja directly and reduce build noise
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:28:03 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.9.19; emacs 29.0.60

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 02/02/2023 19.59, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
>> 
>>> A significant portion of our CI logs are just enumerating each
>>> successfully built object file. The current widespread versions of
>>> ninja don't have a quiet option so we use NINJA_STATUS to add a fixed
>>> string to the ninja output which we then filter with fgrep. If there
>>> are any errors in the output we get them from the compiler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest-template.yml | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)0
>>>
>>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest-template.yml 
>>> b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest-template.yml
>>> index 73ecfabb8d..3c4b237e4f 100644
>>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest-template.yml
>>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest-template.yml
>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>>         then
>>>           ../meson/meson.py configure . -Dbackend_max_links="$LD_JOBS" ;
>>>         fi || exit 1;
>>> -    - make -j"$JOBS"
>>> +    - env NINJA_STATUS="[ninja][%f/%t] " ninja | fgrep -v "[ninja]"
>>>       - if test -n "$MAKE_CHECK_ARGS";
>>>         then
>>>           make -j"$JOBS" $MAKE_CHECK_ARGS ;
>> This is too much for gitlab as it trips up on no output at all. 
>
> I'm also not sure whether it is really safe to not run make here at
> all. Some parts of our build system still rely on the "make" magic, I
> think, and you might miss them if only running ninja. For example
> pc-bios/optionrom/ does not get compiled without running "make".

OK I'll see if I can embed it in make somehow.

> TBH, I also think the output of the file that currently gets compiled
> is still valuable in some cases, too, e.g. if you want to be sure
> whether certain files get compiled in one configuration at all or not.
> So I'm rather in favor in not doing this change.

For a successful build you can always go an examine the artefacts after
the fact. This is about making the CI log as short and informative as
possible to make spotting where errors occur easier.

>
>  Thomas


-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]