qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Disintegrate the build-coroutine-


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Disintegrate the build-coroutine-sigaltstack job
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:08:46 +0100

Am 03.02.2023 um 12:23 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> On 30/01/2023 11.58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:44:46AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > We can get rid of the build-coroutine-sigaltstack job by moving
> > > the configure flags that should be tested here to other jobs:
> > > Move --with-coroutine=sigaltstack to the build-without-defaults job
> > > and --enable-trace-backends=ftrace to the cross-s390x-kvm-only job.
> > 
> > The biggest user of coroutines is the block layer. So we probably
> > ought to have coroutines aligned with a job that triggers the
> > 'make check-block' for iotests.  IIUC,  the without-defaults
> > job won't do that. How about, arbitrarily, using either the
> > 'check-system-debian' or 'check-system-ubuntu' job. Those distros
> > are closely related, so getting sigaltstack vs ucontext coverage
> > between them is a good win, and they both trigger the block jobs
> > IIUC.
> 
> I gave it a try with the ubuntu job, but this apparently trips up the iotests:
> 
>  https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/3705965062#L212
> 
> Does anybody have a clue what could be going wrong here?

I'm not sure how changing the coroutine backend could cause it, but
primarily this looks like an assertion failure in migration code.

Dave, Juan, any ideas what this assertion checks and why it could be
failing?

Kevin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]