qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] mm: Introduce memfd_restricted system call to create


From: Chao Peng
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] mm: Introduce memfd_restricted system call to create restricted user memory
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:58:44 +0800

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:21:39PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:06:32PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:13:37PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > +static struct file *restrictedmem_file_create(struct file *memfd)
> > > +{
> > > + struct restrictedmem_data *data;
> > > + struct address_space *mapping;
> > > + struct inode *inode;
> > > + struct file *file;
> > > +
> > > + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!data)
> > > +         return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > +
> > > + data->memfd = memfd;
> > > + mutex_init(&data->lock);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&data->notifiers);
> > > +
> > > + inode = alloc_anon_inode(restrictedmem_mnt->mnt_sb);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > > +         kfree(data);
> > > +         return ERR_CAST(inode);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + inode->i_mode |= S_IFREG;
> > > + inode->i_op = &restrictedmem_iops;
> > > + inode->i_mapping->private_data = data;
> > > +
> > > + file = alloc_file_pseudo(inode, restrictedmem_mnt,
> > > +                          "restrictedmem", O_RDWR,
> > > +                          &restrictedmem_fops);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> > > +         iput(inode);
> > > +         kfree(data);
> > > +         return ERR_CAST(file);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + file->f_flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
> > > +
> > > + mapping = memfd->f_mapping;
> > > + mapping_set_unevictable(mapping);
> > > + mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping,
> > > +                      mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~__GFP_MOVABLE);
> > 
> > Is this supposed to prevent migration of pages being used for
> > restrictedmem/shmem backend?
> 
> Yes, my bad. I expected it to prevent migration, but it is not true.
> 
> Looks like we need to bump refcount in restrictedmem_get_page() and reduce
> it back when KVM is no longer use it.

The restrictedmem_get_page() has taken a reference, but later KVM
put_page() after populating the secondary page table entry through
kvm_release_pfn_clean(). One option would let the user feature(e.g.
TDX/SEV) to get_page/put_page() during populating the secondary page
table entry, AFAICS, this requirement also comes from these features.

Chao
> 
> Chao, could you adjust it?
> 
> -- 
>   Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]