[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:05:36 -0500 |
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:24:14PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the
> >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a
> >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy
> >> >> >> but
> >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration
> >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code.
> >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded
> >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally
> >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned
> >> >> >> up
> >> >> >> functions.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as
> >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the
> >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked
> >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your
> >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ...
> >> >>
> >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is
> >> >> something different about the CI.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2
> >> >
> >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then
> >> > clang-system manually.
> >>
> >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I
> >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem
> >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I
> >> think that is a limitation of the test harness.
> >>
> >> Will keep looking.
> >
> > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there?
>
> I can repeat a problem locally on Debian Bullseye and Ubuntu 22.04 with clang
> and leak sanitizer:
>
> # QEMU configure log Thu 24 Nov 16:02:56 GMT 2022
> # Configured with: '../../configure' '--cc=clang' '--cxx=clang++'
> '--enable-sanitizers'
> '--target-list=arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu'#
>
> And the command:
>
> env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm
> QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon
> QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=178
> G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh
> ./tests/qtest/qos-test -p
> /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess
>
> Gives the following failure, while a leak may not be that exciting it
> does point to a potential corruption issue. Unfortunately I don't get a
> decent backtrace from the tool:
>
> # random seed: R02S071fe8d68317a8b01e5e7fadbf1ac60a
> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock
> -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0
> -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -machine none -accel qtest
> ==1024354==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext
> functions and may produce false positives in some cases!
> # Start of arm tests
> # Start of virt tests
> # Start of virtio-mmio tests
> # Start of virtio-bus tests
> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-device tests
> # Start of vhost-user-gpio tests
> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests
> # Start of read-guest-mem tests
> # Start of memfile tests
> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock
> -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0
> -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M virt -device
> vhost-user-gpio-device,id=gpio0,chardev=chr-vhost-user-test -m 256 -object
> memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M, -numa node,memdev=mem -chardev
> socket,id=chr-vhost-user-test,path=/tmp/vhost-test-8DD2V1/vhost-user-test.sock
> -accel qtest
> # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used
> after threads are created
> ==1024371==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext
> functions and may produce false positives in some cases!
> # set_protocol_features: 0x200
> # set_owner: start of session
> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14
> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14
> # set_vring_num: 0/1024
> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds.
> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22)
> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds.
> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22)
> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds.
> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22)
> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds.
> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22)
> ok 1
> /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess
> # SKIP No memory at address 0x0
> # End of memfile tests
> # End of read-guest-mem tests
> # End of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests
> # End of vhost-user-gpio tests
> # End of vhost-user-gpio-device tests
> # End of virtio-bus tests
> # End of virtio-mmio tests
> # End of virt tests
> # End of arm tests
> 1..1
>
> =================================================================
> ==1024371==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
>
> Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x561d9a5d7a18 in __interceptor_calloc
> (/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/qemu-system-arm+0x1d1fa18)
> (BuildId: 0bdc7c2ada2277089db16d57f17c314e9e53e41c)
> #1 0x7f46ee656c40 in g_malloc0
> (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5ec40) (BuildId:
> 0ab0b740e34eeb0c84656ba53737f4c440dfbed4)
> #2 0x561d9bf7875b in virtio_device_realize
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/virtio/virtio.c:4175:9
> #3 0x561d9c321bf4 in device_set_realized
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/core/qdev.c:566:13
> #4 0x561d9c33dda8 in property_set_bool
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:2285:5
> #5 0x561d9c338fb3 in object_property_set
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:1420:5
> #6 0x561d9c344c7c in object_property_set_qobject
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/qom-qobject.c:28:10
> #7 0x561d9b367954 in qdev_device_add
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:733:11
> #8 0x561d9b36f832 in qemu_create_cli_devices
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2536:5
> #9 0x561d9b36f832 in qmp_x_exit_preconfig
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2604:5
> #10 0x561d9b37613f in qemu_init
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:3601:9
> #11 0x561d9a6125a5 in main
> /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/main.c:47:5
>
> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 240 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
> ../../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:179: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU
> process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0)
> fish: Job 1, 'env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-sy…' terminated by signal
> SIGABRT (Abort)
> 🕙22:26:18 alex.bennee@hackbox2:qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers on
> for-7.2/virtio-fixes [$?] [⚡ IOT]
> ✗
ok ... was gpio always like this? from 1st commit? if not bisect?
>
>
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Alex Bennée (2):
> >> >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables
> >> >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43
> >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> 2.34.1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Alex Bennée
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Bennée
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
- [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/23
- [PATCH v1 1/2] include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/23
- [PATCH v1 2/2] include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/23
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/11/23
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/23
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/11/23
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/24
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/11/24
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/24
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/24
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/25
- Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes, Alex Bennée, 2022/11/25