Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] migration: Drop rs->f

[Juan Quintela]

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> Now with rs->pss we can already cache channels in pss->pss_channels.  That
> pss_channel contains more infromation than rs->f because it's per-channel.
> So rs->f could be replaced by rss->pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY].pss_channel,
> while rs->f itself is a bit vague now.
>
> Note that vanilla postcopy still send pages via pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY],
> that's slightly confusing but it reflects the reality.
>
> Then, after the replacement we can safely drop rs->f.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>