[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects fo
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects for win32 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:03:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07) |
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:14:55AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> > >
> > > The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
> > > MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v4:
> > > - make the out of bounds access protection explicit
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - move the check of adding the same HANDLE twice to a separete patch
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - fix the logic in qemu_add_wait_object() to avoid adding
> > > the same HANDLE twice
> > >
> > > util/main-loop.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Ping?
>
> Would you queue this series? Thanks!
The main loop is not my area as maintainer - it would normally be
Paolo IIRC.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects for win32,
Daniel P . Berrangé <=