|
From: | Helge Deller |
Subject: | Re: [PULL 00/12] linux-user patches |
Date: | Sun, 18 Sep 2022 20:52:33 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1 |
On 9/17/22 22:11, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 15:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:On 17/9/22 16:26, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:The close_range(2) man page says: close_range() first appeared in Linux 5.9. Library support was added in glibc in version 2.34. The qemu-user GitLab CI jobs are failing. For example, see https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629417: ../linux-user/syscall.c:8734:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'close_range' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return get_errno(close_range(arg1, arg2, arg3)); ^ There is a second issue with this pull request: ../linux-user/syscall.c:357:16: error: ‘pidfd_getfd’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 357 | _syscall3(int, pidfd_getfd, int, pidfd, int, targetfd, unsigned int, flags); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../linux-user/syscall.c:251:13: note: in definition of macro ‘_syscall3’ See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629434.
Stefan, Thanks for testing those patches! I'll send a new series with those issues fixed soon.
Hmm apparently this PR hasn't been reviewed (although the patches were on the list for 2 weeks). The 'check DCO' job - looking for S-o-b tags - is green: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629425. Should we complete it by a R-b/A-b check over the commit range?In some areas there will be no R-b/A-b, so I don't think we can require those checks. Was this pull request supposed to go through Laurent instead of being applied directly by me?
I'm fine with either way :-) Thanks! Helge Btw, I have a whole bunch of additional patches on top of this series so it would be good to get this series in first...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |