[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects fo
From: |
Bin Meng |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects for win32 |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 2022 12:19:51 +0800 |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:52 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
>
> The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
> MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - move the check of adding the same HANDLE twice to a separete patch
>
> Changes in v2:
> - fix the logic in qemu_add_wait_object() to avoid adding
> the same HANDLE twice
>
> util/main-loop.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/main-loop.c b/util/main-loop.c
> index f00a25451b..cb018dc33c 100644
> --- a/util/main-loop.c
> +++ b/util/main-loop.c
> @@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ void qemu_del_polling_cb(PollingFunc *func, void
> *opaque)
> /* Wait objects support */
> typedef struct WaitObjects {
> int num;
> - int revents[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1];
> - HANDLE events[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1];
> - WaitObjectFunc *func[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1];
> - void *opaque[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1];
> + int revents[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS];
> + HANDLE events[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS];
> + WaitObjectFunc *func[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS];
> + void *opaque[MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS];
> } WaitObjects;
>
> static WaitObjects wait_objects = {0};
> @@ -395,6 +395,9 @@ void qemu_del_wait_object(HANDLE handle, WaitObjectFunc
> *func, void *opaque)
> if (w->events[i] == handle) {
> found = 1;
> }
> + if (i == MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS - 1) {
> + break;
> + }
> if (found) {
> w->events[i] = w->events[i + 1];
> w->func[i] = w->func[i + 1];
> --
Ping for this series?
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] util/main-loop: Fix maximum number of wait objects for win32,
Bin Meng <=