[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 15/25] Deprecate 32 bit big-endian MIPS
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 15/25] Deprecate 32 bit big-endian MIPS |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:57:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.0; emacs 28.1.91 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 26/08/2022 19.21, Alex Bennée wrote:
<snip>
>> - * - MIPS
>> + * - MIPS (LE only)
>
> I'd replace "LE" with "little endian" - not everybody might know that
> abbreviation.
<snip>
>> +'''''''''''''''''''
>> +
>> +A Debian 10 ("Buster") moved into LTS the big endian 32 bit version of
>
> s/A Debian/As Debian/
Fixed.
>> +MIPS moved out of support making it hard to maintain our
>> +cross-compilation CI tests of the architecture. As we no longer have
>> +CI coverage support may bitrot away before the deprecation process
>> +completes. The little endian variants of MIPS (both 32 and 64 bit) are
>> +still a supported host architecture.
>> +
>> QEMU API (QAPI) events
>> ----------------------
> ...
>> diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-mips-cross.docker
>> b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-mips-cross.docker
>> index 26c154014d..75943619df 100644
>> --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-mips-cross.docker
>> +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-mips-cross.docker
>> @@ -1,32 +1,14 @@
>> #
>> -# Docker mips cross-compiler target
>> +# Docker cross-compiler target
>
> Why did you remove the "mips" here?
You may notice most of the flattened cross compiler docker images are
basically the same save the last two lines. I ended up just copy pasting
the preamble as I went along. I could restore if you like.
>
> Thomas
--
Alex Bennée
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v1 15/25] Deprecate 32 bit big-endian MIPS,
Alex Bennée <=