qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] e1000e: set RX desc status with DD flag in a separate operation


From: Ding Hui
Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: set RX desc status with DD flag in a separate operation
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:05:43 +0800

Like commit 034d00d48581 ("e1000: set RX descriptor status in
a separate operation"), there is also same issue in e1000e, which
would cause lost packets or stop sending packets to VM with DPDK.

Do similar fix in e1000e.

Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/402
Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
---
 hw/net/e1000e_core.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/e1000e_core.c b/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
index 208e3e0d79..b8038e4014 100644
--- a/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
+++ b/hw/net/e1000e_core.c
@@ -1364,6 +1364,58 @@ struct NetRxPkt *pkt, const E1000E_RSSInfo *rss_info,
     }
 }
 
+static inline void
+e1000e_pci_dma_write_rx_desc(E1000ECore *core, dma_addr_t addr,
+                             uint8_t *desc, dma_addr_t len)
+{
+    PCIDevice *dev = core->owner;
+
+    if (e1000e_rx_use_legacy_descriptor(core)) {
+        struct e1000_rx_desc *d = (struct e1000_rx_desc *) desc;
+        size_t offset = offsetof(struct e1000_rx_desc, status);
+        typeof(d->status) status = d->status;
+
+        d->status &= ~E1000_RXD_STAT_DD;
+        pci_dma_write(dev, addr, desc, len);
+
+        if (status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
+            d->status = status;
+            pci_dma_write(dev, addr + offset, &status, sizeof(status));
+        }
+    } else {
+        if (core->mac[RCTL] & E1000_RCTL_DTYP_PS) {
+            union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split *d =
+                (union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split *) desc;
+            size_t offset = offsetof(union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split,
+                wb.middle.status_error);
+            typeof(d->wb.middle.status_error) status =
+                d->wb.middle.status_error;
+
+            d->wb.middle.status_error &= ~E1000_RXD_STAT_DD;
+            pci_dma_write(dev, addr, desc, len);
+
+            if (status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
+                d->wb.middle.status_error = status;
+                pci_dma_write(dev, addr + offset, &status, sizeof(status));
+            }
+        } else {
+            union e1000_rx_desc_extended *d =
+                (union e1000_rx_desc_extended *) desc;
+            size_t offset = offsetof(union e1000_rx_desc_extended,
+                wb.upper.status_error);
+            typeof(d->wb.upper.status_error) status = d->wb.upper.status_error;
+
+            d->wb.upper.status_error &= ~E1000_RXD_STAT_DD;
+            pci_dma_write(dev, addr, desc, len);
+
+            if (status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
+                d->wb.upper.status_error = status;
+                pci_dma_write(dev, addr + offset, &status, sizeof(status));
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 typedef struct e1000e_ba_state_st {
     uint16_t written[MAX_PS_BUFFERS];
     uint8_t cur_idx;
@@ -1600,7 +1652,7 @@ e1000e_write_packet_to_guest(E1000ECore *core, struct 
NetRxPkt *pkt,
 
         e1000e_write_rx_descr(core, desc, is_last ? core->rx_pkt : NULL,
                            rss_info, do_ps ? ps_hdr_len : 0, &bastate.written);
-        pci_dma_write(d, base, &desc, core->rx_desc_len);
+        e1000e_pci_dma_write_rx_desc(core, base, desc, core->rx_desc_len);
 
         e1000e_ring_advance(core, rxi,
                             core->rx_desc_len / E1000_MIN_RX_DESC_LEN);
-- 
2.17.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]