[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hw/virtio: gracefully handle unset vhost_dev vdev
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hw/virtio: gracefully handle unset vhost_dev vdev |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:01:32 -0400 |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 02:55:01PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> I've noticed asserts firing because we query the status of vdev after
> a vhost connection is closed down. Rather than faulting on the NULL
> indirect just quietly reply false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Message-Id: <20220726192150.2435175-8-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Please do not include this header when you post.
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> index 0827d631c0..f758f177bb 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static inline void vhost_dev_log_resize(struct vhost_dev
> *dev, uint64_t size)
> dev->log_size = size;
> }
>
> -static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +static bool vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> {
> VirtIODevice *vdev = dev->vdev;
>
> @@ -316,8 +316,12 @@ static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> * does not have IOMMU, there's no need to enable this feature
> * which may cause unnecessary IOTLB miss/update transactions.
> */
> - return virtio_bus_device_iommu_enabled(vdev) &&
> - virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> + if (vdev) {
> + return virtio_bus_device_iommu_enabled(vdev) &&
> + virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> + } else {
> + return false;
> + }
> }
>
> static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
> --
> 2.30.2
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hw/virtio: gracefully handle unset vhost_dev vdev,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=