[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:14:12 +0100 |
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:04:44 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:44:03 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:08:25 +0100
> > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:07:06 +0800
> > > > Bobo WL <lmw.bobo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jonathan
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your reply!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:37 PM Jonathan Cameron
> > > > > <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Probably not related to your problem, but there is a disconnect in
> > > > > > QEMU /
> > > > > > kernel assumptionsaround the presence of an HDM decoder when a HB
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > has a single root port. Spec allows it to be provided or not as an
> > > > > > implementation choice.
> > > > > > Kernel assumes it isn't provide. Qemu assumes it is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The temporary solution is to throw in a second root port on the HB
> > > > > > and not
> > > > > > connect anything to it. Longer term I may special case this so
> > > > > > that the particular
> > > > > > decoder defaults to pass through settings in QEMU if there is only
> > > > > > one root port.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You are right! After adding an extra HB in qemu, I can create a x1
> > > > > region successfully.
> > > > > But have some errors in Nvdimm:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 74.925838] Unknown online node for memory at 0x10000000000,
> > > > > assuming node 0
> > > > > [ 74.925846] Unknown target node for memory at 0x10000000000,
> > > > > assuming node 0
> > > > > [ 74.927470] nd_region region0: nmem0: is disabled, failing probe
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah. I've seen this one, but not chased it down yet. Was on my todo
> > > > list to chase
> > > > down. Once I reach this state I can verify the HDM Decode is correct
> > > > which is what
> > > > I've been using to test (Which wasn't true until earlier this week).
> > > > I'm currently testing via devmem, more for historical reasons than
> > > > because it makes
> > > > that much sense anymore.
> > >
> > > *embarassed cough*. We haven't fully hooked the LSA up in qemu yet.
> > > I'd forgotten that was still on the todo list. I don't think it will
> > > be particularly hard to do and will take a look in next few days.
> > >
> > > Very very indirectly this error is causing a driver probe fail that means
> > > that
> > > we hit a code path that has a rather odd looking check on NDD_LABELING.
> > > Should not have gotten near that path though - hence the problem is
> > > actually
> > > when we call cxl_pmem_get_config_data() and it returns an error because
> > > we haven't fully connected up the command in QEMU.
> >
> > So a least one bug in QEMU. We were not supporting variable length payloads
> > on mailbox
> > inputs (but were on outputs). That hasn't mattered until we get to LSA
> > writes.
> > We just need to relax condition on the supplied length.
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > index c352a935c4..fdda9529fe 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> > cxl_cmd = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
> > h = cxl_cmd->handler;
> > if (h) {
> > - if (len == cxl_cmd->in) {
> > + if (len == cxl_cmd->in || !cxl_cmd->in) {
> Fix is wrong as we use ~0 as the placeholder for variable payload, not 0.
Cause of the error is a failure in GET_LSA.
Reason, payload length is wrong in QEMU but was hidden previously by my wrong
fix here. Probably still a good idea to inject an error in GET_LSA and chase
down the refcount issue.
diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
index fdda9529fe..e8565fbd6e 100644
--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {
cmd_identify_memory_device, 0, 0 },
[CCLS][GET_PARTITION_INFO] = { "CCLS_GET_PARTITION_INFO",
cmd_ccls_get_partition_info, 0, 0 },
- [CCLS][GET_LSA] = { "CCLS_GET_LSA", cmd_ccls_get_lsa, 0, 0 },
+ [CCLS][GET_LSA] = { "CCLS_GET_LSA", cmd_ccls_get_lsa, 8, 0 },
[CCLS][SET_LSA] = { "CCLS_SET_LSA", cmd_ccls_set_lsa,
~0, IMMEDIATE_CONFIG_CHANGE | IMMEDIATE_DATA_CHANGE },
[MEDIA_AND_POISON][GET_POISON_LIST] = { "MEDIA_AND_POISON_GET_POISON_LIST",
@@ -510,12 +510,13 @@ void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
cxl_cmd = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
h = cxl_cmd->handler;
if (h) {
- if (len == cxl_cmd->in || !cxl_cmd->in) {
+ if (len == cxl_cmd->in || cxl_cmd->in == ~0) {
cxl_cmd->payload = cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state +
A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD;
And woot, we get a namespace in the LSA :)
I'll post QEMU fixes in next day or two. Kernel side now seems more or less
fine be it with suspicious refcount underflow.
>
> With that fixed we hit new fun paths - after some errors we get the
> worrying - not totally sure but looks like a failure on an error cleanup.
> I'll chase down the error source, but even then this is probably triggerable
> by
> hardware problem or similar. Some bonus prints in here from me chasing
> error paths, but it's otherwise just cxl/next + the fix I posted earlier
> today.
>
> [ 69.919877] nd_bus ndbus0: START: nd_region.probe(region0)
> [ 69.920108] nd_region_probe
> [ 69.920623] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 69.920675] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
> [ 69.921314] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 710 at lib/refcount.c:25
> refcount_warn_saturate+0xa0/0x144
> [ 69.926949] Modules linked in: cxl_pmem cxl_mem cxl_pci cxl_port cxl_acpi
> cxl_core
> [ 69.928830] CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3+ #399
> [ 69.930596] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> [ 69.931482] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [ 69.932403] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 69.934023] pc : refcount_warn_saturate+0xa0/0x144
> [ 69.935161] lr : refcount_warn_saturate+0xa0/0x144
> [ 69.936541] sp : ffff80000890b960
> [ 69.937921] x29: ffff80000890b960 x28: 0000000000000000 x27:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 69.940917] x26: ffffa54a90d5cb10 x25: ffffa54a90809e98 x24:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 69.942537] x23: ffffa54a91a3d8d8 x22: ffff0000c5254800 x21:
> ffff0000c5254800
> [ 69.944013] x20: ffff0000ce924180 x19: ffff0000c5254800 x18:
> ffffffffffffffff
> [ 69.946100] x17: ffff5ab66e5ef000 x16: ffff80000801c000 x15:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 69.947585] x14: 0000000000000001 x13: 0a2e656572662d72 x12:
> 657466612d657375
> [ 69.948670] x11: 203b30206e6f206e x10: 6f69746964646120 x9 :
> ffffa54a8f63d288
> [ 69.950679] x8 : 206e6f206e6f6974 x7 : 69646461203a745f x6 :
> 00000000fffff31e
> [ 69.952113] x5 : ffff0000ff61ba08 x4 : 00000000fffff31e x3 :
> ffff5ab66e5ef000
> root@debian:/sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/region0# [ 69.954752] x2 :
> 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000c512e740
> [ 69.957098] Call trace:
> [ 69.957959] refcount_warn_saturate+0xa0/0x144
> [ 69.958773] get_ndd+0x5c/0x80
> [ 69.959294] nd_region_register_namespaces+0xe4/0xe90
> [ 69.960253] nd_region_probe+0x100/0x290
> [ 69.960796] nvdimm_bus_probe+0xf4/0x1c0
> [ 69.962087] really_probe+0x19c/0x3f0
> [ 69.962620] __driver_probe_device+0x11c/0x190
> [ 69.963258] driver_probe_device+0x44/0xf4
> [ 69.963773] __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x140
> [ 69.964471] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
> [ 69.965068] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1f0
> [ 69.966101] device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30
> [ 69.967142] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0
> [ 69.968104] device_add+0x3e8/0x910
> [ 69.969111] nd_async_device_register+0x24/0x74
> [ 69.969928] async_run_entry_fn+0x40/0x150
> [ 69.970725] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x450
> [ 69.971796] worker_thread+0x154/0x450
> [ 69.972700] kthread+0x118/0x120
> [ 69.974141] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> [ 69.975141] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [ 70.117887] Into nd_namespace_pmem_set_resource()
>
> > cxl_cmd->payload = cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state +
> > A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD;
> > ret = (*h)(cxl_cmd, cxl_dstate, &len);
> >
> >
> > This lets the nvdimm/region probe fine, but I'm getting some issues with
> > namespace capacity so I'll look at what is causing that next.
> > Unfortunately I'm not that familiar with the driver/nvdimm side of things
> > so it's take a while to figure out what kicks off what!
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And x4 region still failed with same errors, using latest cxl/preview
> > > > > branch don't work.
> > > > > I have picked "Two CXL emulation fixes" patches in qemu, still not
> > > > > working.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob
> > >
> > >
> >
>
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, (continued)
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Bobo WL, 2022/08/09
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/09
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/11
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/12
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Dan Williams, 2022/08/12
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/12
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/15
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/15
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Peter Maydell, 2022/08/15
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/15
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region,
Jonathan Cameron <=
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Dan Williams, 2022/08/15
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/17
RE: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Dan Williams, 2022/08/08
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Bobo WL, 2022/08/09
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Dan Williams, 2022/08/09
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Bobo WL, 2022/08/10
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Dan Williams, 2022/08/11
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/17
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/18
- Re: [BUG] cxl can not create region, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/08/19