|
From: | Laurent Vivier |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] linux-user/aarch64: Reset target data on MADV_DONTNEED |
Date: | Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:54:35 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 |
Le 11/08/2022 à 17:18, Alex Bennée a écrit :
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> writes:Le 11/08/2022 à 13:54, Peter Maydell a écrit :On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 09:29, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote:Le 10/08/2022 à 22:47, Richard Henderson a écrit :On 8/10/22 13:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:Sorry, I only noticed today that it's not submitted. Version is not critical for us, as we build from masters anyway. Richard, do you know a reason to consider this critical? On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 13:04, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org <mailto:peter.maydell@linaro.org>> wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 21:00, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com <mailto:vitalybuka@google.com>> wrote: > > How can we land this one? Pinging it a week ago rather than now would have been a good start :-( I think it got missed because you didn't cc the linux-user maintainer. Is this a critical fix for 7.1 or can we let it slip to 7.2 ?It's unfortunate that it got missed. It's not critical, but it would be nice, because support for MADV_DONTNEED is new in 7.1 (previously, we ignored all madvise). I'll note there are missing braces for coding style on an IF. Laurent, do you have an objection to merging this for rc3?No objection. Do you want it goes via the arm branch or via the linux-user branch? If it goes via linux-user I can run the LTP testsuite but it takes 1 day.I think we should definitely run the LTP testsuite on it, so taking it via linux-user probably makes more sense.ok, applied to my linux-user-for-7.1 branch. Running tests.Any chance you could pick up: Subject: [PATCH v2] linux-user: un-parent OBJECT(cpu) when closing thread Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:05:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20220803130537.763666-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> before you run the tests?
I've tested it, it works fine. Do you plan to do a PR including it or do you want I do (there will be only this one in mine)? Thanks, Laurent
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |