Re: [PATCH 3/9] error-report: introduce "detailed" variable

[Markus Armbruster]

marcandre.lureau@redhat.com writes:

> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>
> Let's use a more explicit variable "detailed" instead of calling
> monitor_cur() multiple times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> ---
>  util/error-report.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/error-report.c b/util/error-report.c
> index 98f242b75bbf..893da10f19bc 100644
> --- a/util/error-report.c
> +++ b/util/error-report.c
> @@ -195,16 +195,17 @@ real_time_iso8601(void)
>   */
>  static void vreport(report_type type, const char *fmt, va_list ap)
>  {
> +    bool detailed = !monitor_cur();
>      gchar *timestr;
>  
> -    if (message_with_timestamp && !monitor_cur()) {
> +    if (message_with_timestamp && detailed) {
>          timestr = real_time_iso8601();
>          error_printf("%s ", timestr);
>          g_free(timestr);
>      }
>  
>      /* Only prepend guest name if -msg guest-name and -name guest=... are 
> set */
> -    if (error_with_guestname && error_guest_name && !monitor_cur()) {
> +    if (error_with_guestname && error_guest_name && detailed) {
>          error_printf("%s ", error_guest_name);
>      }

Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>