qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio-mmio: cleanup reset


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio-mmio: cleanup reset
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:22:40 +0200
User-agent: Notmuch/0.36 (https://notmuchmail.org)

On Thu, Jun 09 2022, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> Make virtio_mmio_soft_reset reset the virtio device, which is performed by
> both the "soft" and the "hard" reset; and then call virtio_mmio_soft_reset
> from virtio_mmio_reset to emphasize that the latter is a superset of the
> former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> index 6d81a26473..d240efef97 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ static void virtio_mmio_soft_reset(VirtIOMMIOProxy *proxy)
>  {
>      int i;
>  
> -    if (proxy->legacy) {
> -        return;
> -    }
> +    virtio_bus_reset(&proxy->bus);
>  
> -    for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
> -        proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
> +    if (!proxy->legacy) {
> +        for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
> +            proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
> +        }
>      }
>  }

The more I look at this, the more confused I get.

The current code calls soft_reset when the driver sets the status to 0,
after already having called virtio_reset(). But doesn't virtio_reset()
ultimately already trigger the virtio-mmio reset routine, which sets
enabled to 0 for all queues? Why do that again? (And why is soft_reset a
"soft reset"?)

Maybe I'm missing something obvious, or it is simply -ENOCOFFEE on my side.

>  
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> offset, uint64_t value,
>              return;
>          }
>          if (value == 0) {
> -            virtio_bus_reset(&vdev->bus);
> +            virtio_mmio_soft_reset(proxy);
>          } else {
>              virtio_queue_set_addr(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
>                                    value << proxy->guest_page_shift);
> @@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> offset, uint64_t value,
>          }
>  
>          if (vdev->status == 0) {
> -            virtio_reset(vdev);
>              virtio_mmio_soft_reset(proxy);
>          }
>          break;
> @@ -627,7 +626,8 @@ static void virtio_mmio_reset(DeviceState *d)
>      VirtIOMMIOProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_MMIO(d);
>      int i;
>  
> -    virtio_bus_reset(&proxy->bus);
> +    virtio_mmio_soft_reset(proxy);
> +
>      proxy->host_features_sel = 0;
>      proxy->guest_features_sel = 0;
>      proxy->guest_page_shift = 0;
> @@ -636,7 +636,6 @@ static void virtio_mmio_reset(DeviceState *d)
>          proxy->guest_features[0] = proxy->guest_features[1] = 0;
>  
>          for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
> -            proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
>              proxy->vqs[i].num = 0;
>              proxy->vqs[i].desc[0] = proxy->vqs[i].desc[1] = 0;
>              proxy->vqs[i].avail[0] = proxy->vqs[i].avail[1] = 0;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]