qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 05/12] tests/tcg: Test overflow conditions


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [PULL 05/12] tests/tcg: Test overflow conditions
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:58:58 +0200

From: Gautam Agrawal <gautamnagrawal@gmail.com>

Add a test to check for overflow conditions in s390x.
This patch is based on the following patches :
* https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=5a2e67a691501
* https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc6e0d0f2db51

Signed-off-by: Gautam Agrawal <gautamnagrawal@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220531183524.40948-1-gautamnagrawal@gmail.com>
[thuth: Move overflow.c to tests/tcg/multiarch/ to make it generic]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 tests/tcg/multiarch/overflow.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/tcg/multiarch/overflow.c

diff --git a/tests/tcg/multiarch/overflow.c b/tests/tcg/multiarch/overflow.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1c59c2cb70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/multiarch/overflow.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+int overflow_add_32(int x, int y)
+{
+    int res;
+    return __builtin_add_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_add_64(long long x, long long y)
+{
+    long long res;
+    return __builtin_add_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_sub_32(int x, int y)
+{
+    int res;
+    return __builtin_sub_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_sub_64(long long x, long long y)
+{
+    long long res;
+    return __builtin_sub_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int a1_add = -2147483648;
+int b1_add = -2147483648;
+long long a2_add = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+long long b2_add = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+
+int a1_sub;
+int b1_sub = -2147483648;
+long long a2_sub = 0L;
+long long b2_sub = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+
+int main()
+{
+    int ret = 0;
+
+    if (!overflow_add_32(a1_add, b1_add)) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while adding 32 bits\n");
+        ret = 1;
+    }
+    if (!overflow_add_64(a2_add, b2_add)) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while adding 64 bits\n");
+        ret = 1;
+    }
+    if (!overflow_sub_32(a1_sub, b1_sub)) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while subtracting 32 bits\n");
+        ret = 1;
+    }
+    if (!overflow_sub_64(a2_sub, b2_sub)) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while subtracting 64 bits\n");
+        ret = 1;
+    }
+    return ret;
+}
-- 
2.31.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]