[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] docs: rSTify MailingLists wiki; move it to QEMU Git
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] docs: rSTify MailingLists wiki; move it to QEMU Git |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:01:28 +0000 |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 09:55, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:12:50PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 16:00, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:25:05PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > On 14/03/2022 11.49, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > At least the "users" mailing list is not related to development, so
> > > > maybe
> > > > this should rather go into docs/about/ instead?
> > >
> > > Yeah, makes sense. I wonder if should create a new doc in docs/about/
> > > for user-lists, as none of the existing docs fit the bill:
> > >
> > > build-platforms.rst deprecated.rst index.rst license.rst
> > > removed-features.rst
> >
> > Yes, I think that about/ should have a document something like
> > "Contacting the project" or "Support", which could tell users about not just
> > the user-facing mailing lists but also where to file bugs, and so on.
> >
> > In fact, it should probably look rather like the
> > https://www.qemu.org/support/ page...
>
> Heh, thanks, I missed that page. So, if I parsed you right, you're
> implying, given the above qemu-web page, there's no need for a separate
> about/support.rst doc.
I think there is some merit in the documentation being standalone,
even if it does mean a bit of duplication with the website.
-- PMM
- [PATCH v2 1/3] docs: rSTify "security-process" page; move it to QEMU Git, (continued)
[PATCH v2 3/3] docs: rSTify GettingStartedDevelopers wiki; move it to QEMU Git, Kashyap Chamarthy, 2022/03/14