HI,
On 2021/12/21 下午1:41, WANG Xuerui
wrote:
+ case 0b001110: /* indexed, atomic, bounds-checking memory operations */
+ uint32_t sel = (insn >> 15) & 0b11111111111;
+
+ switch (sel) {
+ case 0b00000100000: /* stx.b */
+ case 0b00000101000: /* stx.h */
+ case 0b00000110000: /* stx.w */
+ case 0b00000111000: /* stx.d */
+ case 0b00001110000: /* fstx.s */
+ case 0b00001111000: /* fstx.d */
+ case 0b00011101100: /* fstgt.s */
+ case 0b00011101101: /* fstgt.d */
+ case 0b00011101110: /* fstle.s */
+ case 0b00011101111: /* fstle.d */
+ case 0b00011111000: /* stgt.b */
+ case 0b00011111001: /* stgt.h */
+ case 0b00011111010: /* stgt.w */
+ case 0b00011111011: /* stgt.d */
+ case 0b00011111100: /* stle.b */
+ case 0b00011111101: /* stle.h */
+ case 0b00011111110: /* stle.w */
+ case 0b00011111111: /* stle.d */
+ case 0b00011000000 ... 0b00011100011: /* am* insns */
+ return true;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
We build qemu-x86_64 on LoongArch machine, but got an error,
../linux-user/host/loongarch64/host-signal.h:57:9: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
uint32_t sel = (insn >> 15) & 0b11111111111;
^~~~~~~~
I think we should define 'sel' before:
/* Detect store by reading the instruction at the program counter. */
switch ((insn >> 26) & 0b111111) {
or
case 0b001110:
{
uint32_t set = ...;
...
}
I can't reproduce the error on both my development machines (amd64
and loongarch64), so I wonder if the issue is related to your
particular setup (i.e. compiler versions and such)?