qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] vfio-user: IOMMU support for remote device


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/14] vfio-user: IOMMU support for remote device
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 14:40:25 +0000

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:35:35AM -0500, Jagannathan Raman wrote:
> Assign separate address space for each device in the remote processes.

If I understand correctly this isn't really an IOMMU. It's abusing the
IOMMU APIs to create isolated address spaces for each device. This way
memory regions added by the vfio-user client do not conflict when there
are multiple vfio-user servers.

Calling pci_root_bus_new() and keeping one PCI bus per VfuObject might
be a cleaner approach:
- Lets you isolate both PCI Memory Space and IO Space.
- Isolates the PCIDevices and their addresses on the bus.
- Isolates irqs.
- No more need to abuse the IOMMU API.

I might be missing something because I haven't investigated how to do
this myself.

> Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: John G Johnson <john.g.johnson@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jagannathan Raman <jag.raman@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/pci/pci.h      |   2 +
>  include/hw/remote/iommu.h |  24 ++++++++
>  hw/pci/pci.c              |   2 +-
>  hw/remote/iommu.c         | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/remote/machine.c       |   5 ++
>  hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c |  20 ++++++-
>  MAINTAINERS               |   2 +
>  hw/remote/meson.build     |   1 +
>  8 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/hw/remote/iommu.h
>  create mode 100644 hw/remote/iommu.c
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> index 5c4016b995..f2fc2d5375 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> @@ -734,6 +734,8 @@ void lsi53c8xx_handle_legacy_cmdline(DeviceState 
> *lsi_dev);
>  qemu_irq pci_allocate_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev);
>  void pci_set_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int level);
>  
> +void pci_init_bus_master(PCIDevice *pci_dev);

This function isn't used in this patch. Why make it public?

> +
>  static inline void pci_irq_assert(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>  {
>      pci_set_irq(pci_dev, 1);
> diff --git a/include/hw/remote/iommu.h b/include/hw/remote/iommu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..42ce0ca383
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/remote/iommu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/*
> + * IOMMU for remote device
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2021 Oracle and/or its affiliates.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef REMOTE_IOMMU_H
> +#define REMOTE_IOMMU_H
> +
> +#include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> +
> +void remote_iommu_free(PCIDevice *pci_dev);
> +
> +void remote_iommu_init(void);
> +
> +void remote_iommu_set(PCIBus *bus);
> +
> +MemoryRegion *remote_iommu_get_ram(PCIDevice *pci_dev);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index 4a84e478ce..57d561cc03 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pcibus = {
>      }
>  };
>  
> -static void pci_init_bus_master(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> +void pci_init_bus_master(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>  {
>      AddressSpace *dma_as = pci_device_iommu_address_space(pci_dev);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/remote/iommu.c b/hw/remote/iommu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..30c866badb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/remote/iommu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +/*
> + * Remote IOMMU
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2021 Oracle and/or its affiliates.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu-common.h"
> +
> +#include "hw/remote/iommu.h"
> +#include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> +#include "exec/memory.h"
> +#include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
> +
> +struct VFUIOMMU {
> +    AddressSpace  as;
> +    MemoryRegion  mr;

I guess this is the root MemoryRegion container? Calling it "root" or
"root_mr" instead of "mr" would make that clearer.

> +};
> +
> +typedef struct VFUPciBus {

There is no uppercase/lowercase consistency between VfuObject vs
VFUIOMMU vs VFUPciBus. Although the coding standard doesn't dictate ABC
vs Abc, please be consistent. I suggest following the VfuObject
convention started in the previous patches. The names would be VfuIommu
and VfuPciBus.

> +    PCIBus           *bus;
> +    struct VFUIOMMU  *iommu[];
> +} VFUPciBus;
> +
> +GHashTable *remote_as_table;
> +
> +static AddressSpace *remote_iommu_get_as(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int 
> devfn)
> +{
> +    VFUPciBus *vfu_pci_bus = NULL;
> +    struct VFUIOMMU *iommu = NULL;
> +
> +    if (!remote_as_table) {
> +        return &address_space_memory;
> +    }
> +
> +    vfu_pci_bus = g_hash_table_lookup(remote_as_table, bus);
> +
> +    if (!vfu_pci_bus) {
> +        vfu_pci_bus = g_malloc0(sizeof(VFUPciBus));
> +        vfu_pci_bus->bus = bus;
> +        g_hash_table_insert(remote_as_table, bus, vfu_pci_bus);
> +    }
> +
> +    iommu = vfu_pci_bus->iommu[devfn];
> +
> +    if (!iommu) {
> +        g_autofree char *mr_name = g_strdup_printf("vfu-ram-%d", devfn);
> +        g_autofree char *as_name = g_strdup_printf("vfu-as-%d", devfn);
> +
> +        iommu = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct VFUIOMMU));
> +
> +        memory_region_init(&iommu->mr, NULL, mr_name, UINT64_MAX);
> +        address_space_init(&iommu->as, &iommu->mr, as_name);
> +
> +        vfu_pci_bus->iommu[devfn] = iommu;
> +    }
> +
> +    return &iommu->as;
> +}
> +
> +void remote_iommu_free(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> +{
> +    VFUPciBus *vfu_pci_bus = NULL;
> +    struct VFUIOMMU *iommu = NULL;
> +
> +    if (!remote_as_table) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    vfu_pci_bus = g_hash_table_lookup(remote_as_table, pci_get_bus(pci_dev));
> +
> +    if (!vfu_pci_bus) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    iommu = vfu_pci_bus->iommu[pci_dev->devfn];
> +
> +    vfu_pci_bus->iommu[pci_dev->devfn] = NULL;
> +
> +    if (iommu) {
> +        memory_region_unref(&iommu->mr);
> +        address_space_destroy(&iommu->as);
> +        g_free(iommu);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void remote_iommu_init(void)
> +{
> +    remote_as_table = g_hash_table_new_full(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +void remote_iommu_set(PCIBus *bus)
> +{
> +    pci_setup_iommu(bus, remote_iommu_get_as, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +MemoryRegion *remote_iommu_get_ram(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> +{
> +    PCIBus *bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev);
> +    VFUPciBus *vfu_pci_bus;
> +
> +    if (!remote_as_table) {
> +        return get_system_memory();
> +    }
> +
> +    vfu_pci_bus = g_hash_table_lookup(remote_as_table, bus);
> +    if (!vfu_pci_bus) {
> +        return get_system_memory();
> +    }
> +
> +    return &vfu_pci_bus->iommu[pci_dev->devfn]->mr;
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/remote/machine.c b/hw/remote/machine.c
> index 952105eab5..023be0491e 100644
> --- a/hw/remote/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/remote/machine.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include "qapi/error.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/pci_host.h"
>  #include "hw/remote/iohub.h"
> +#include "hw/remote/iommu.h"
>  
>  static void remote_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
>  {
> @@ -52,6 +53,10 @@ static void remote_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
>  
>      remote_iohub_init(&s->iohub);
>  
> +    remote_iommu_init();
> +
> +    remote_iommu_set(pci_host->bus);
> +
>      pci_bus_irqs(pci_host->bus, remote_iohub_set_irq, remote_iohub_map_irq,
>                   &s->iohub, REMOTE_IOHUB_NB_PIRQS);
>  }
> diff --git a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> index 9399e87cbe..ae375e69b9 100644
> --- a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> +++ b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>  #include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>  #include "qemu/timer.h"
> +#include "hw/remote/iommu.h"
>  
>  #define TYPE_VFU_OBJECT "x-vfio-user-server"
>  OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(VfuObject, VfuObjectClass, VFU_OBJECT)
> @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ static ssize_t vfu_object_cfg_access(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, 
> char * const buf,
>  
>  static void dma_register(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, vfu_dma_info_t *info)
>  {
> +    VfuObject *o = vfu_get_private(vfu_ctx);
>      MemoryRegion *subregion = NULL;
>      g_autofree char *name = NULL;
>      static unsigned int suffix;
> @@ -226,14 +228,15 @@ static void dma_register(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, 
> vfu_dma_info_t *info)
>      memory_region_init_ram_ptr(subregion, NULL, name,
>                                 iov->iov_len, info->vaddr);
>  
> -    memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), (hwaddr)iov->iov_base,
> -                                subregion);
> +    memory_region_add_subregion(remote_iommu_get_ram(o->pci_dev),
> +                                (hwaddr)iov->iov_base, subregion);
>  
>      trace_vfu_dma_register((uint64_t)iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len);
>  }
>  
>  static void dma_unregister(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, vfu_dma_info_t *info)
>  {
> +    VfuObject *o = vfu_get_private(vfu_ctx);
>      MemoryRegion *mr = NULL;
>      ram_addr_t offset;
>  
> @@ -242,7 +245,7 @@ static void dma_unregister(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, 
> vfu_dma_info_t *info)
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    memory_region_del_subregion(get_system_memory(), mr);
> +    memory_region_del_subregion(remote_iommu_get_ram(o->pci_dev), mr);
>  
>      object_unparent((OBJECT(mr)));
>  
> @@ -320,6 +323,7 @@ static vfu_region_access_cb_t 
> *vfu_object_bar_handlers[PCI_NUM_REGIONS] = {
>   */
>  static void vfu_object_register_bars(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, PCIDevice *pdev)
>  {
> +    VfuObject *o = vfu_get_private(vfu_ctx);
>      int i;
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_REGIONS; i++) {
> @@ -332,6 +336,12 @@ static void vfu_object_register_bars(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, 
> PCIDevice *pdev)
>                           vfu_object_bar_handlers[i],
>                           VFU_REGION_FLAG_RW, NULL, 0, -1, 0);
>  
> +        if ((o->pci_dev->io_regions[i].type & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) == 0) {
> +            memory_region_unref(o->pci_dev->io_regions[i].address_space);
> +            o->pci_dev->io_regions[i].address_space =
> +                remote_iommu_get_ram(o->pci_dev);
> +        }

This looks hacky. If you create a separate PCIHost for each device
instead then the BARs will be created in the MemoryRegion (confusingly
named "address_space" in the PCI code) of your choosing.

Also, why is PCI Memory Space isolated via VFUIOMMU but PCI IO Space is
not?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]