qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Add jobs that run the device-crash-te


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Add jobs that run the device-crash-test
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:07:52 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.1.3 (2021-09-10)

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 05:27:24PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The device-crash-test script has been quite neglected in the past,
> so that it bit-rot quite often. Let's add CI jobs that run this
> script for at least some targets, so that this script does not
> regress that easily anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> index 71d0f407ad..7e1cb0b3c2 100644
> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> @@ -100,6 +100,17 @@ avocado-system-debian:
>      IMAGE: debian-amd64
>      MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-avocado
>  
> +crash-test-debian:
> +  extends: .native_test_job_template
> +  needs:
> +    - job: build-system-debian
> +      artifacts: true
> +  variables:
> +    IMAGE: debian-amd64
> +  script:
> +    - cd build
> +    - scripts/device-crash-test -q ./qemu-system-i386
> +
>  build-system-fedora:
>    extends: .native_build_job_template
>    needs:
> @@ -134,6 +145,18 @@ avocado-system-fedora:
>      IMAGE: fedora
>      MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-avocado
>  
> +crash-test-fedora:
> +  extends: .native_test_job_template
> +  needs:
> +    - job: build-system-fedora
> +      artifacts: true
> +  variables:
> +    IMAGE: fedora
> +  script:
> +    - cd build
> +    - scripts/device-crash-test -q ./qemu-system-ppc
> +    - scripts/device-crash-test -q ./qemu-system-riscv32

I'm curious why you picked all the 32-bit architecture targets to test
this for, since 95% of usage these days will be on the 64-bit targets ?

I guess both 32-bit & 64-bit targets probably have the same set of
devices built mostly, but still wondering if there was a reason for
your choice.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]