qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: tpm: Add missing device identification objects


From: Stefan Berger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: tpm: Add missing device identification objects
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:26:46 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0


On 11/9/21 09:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:01:51AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
Add missing device identification objects _STR and _UID. They will appear
as files 'description' and 'uid' under Linux sysfs.

Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/708
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Do you want this in 6.2?

Yes.



---
  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 1 +
  hw/i386/acpi-build.c     | 8 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
index 674f902652..09456424aa 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_tpm(Aml *scope, VirtMachineState 
*vms)
Aml *dev = aml_device("TPM0");
      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("MSFT0101")));
+    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR", aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));
      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index a3ad6abd33..5bd2160a89 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1808,11 +1808,15 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
                      dev = aml_device("TPM");
                      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID",
                                                    aml_string("MSFT0101")));
+                    aml_append(dev,
+                               aml_name_decl("_STR",
+                                             aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));

When we support more versions, won't this make us
do annoying tricks to say so in the string?
Why not just "TPM device" to future-proof it?

I am not sure what other version there will be and I haven't seen any other descriptions than the one reported here:

https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/708

That's why I took TPM 2.0 device. My TPM 1.2 machine doesn't report it for a TPM 1.2.




haven                 } else {
                      dev = aml_device("ISA.TPM");
                      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID",
                                                    aml_eisaid("PNP0C31")));
                  }
+                aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));

The ACPI spec mentions also matching on _CID.
"6.1.2 _CID (Compatible ID)
This optional object is used to supply OSPM with a device?s Plug and Play-Compatible Device ID. Use _CID

objects when a device has no other defined hardware standard method to report its compatible IDs"


6.1.12 _UID (Unique ID)
This object provides OSPM with a logical device ID that does not change across reboots. This object is optional, but is required when the device has no other way to report a persistent unique device ID. The
_UID must be unique across all devices with either a common _HID or _CID.


Is _CID a must-have for TPM now? We have _HID.


                  aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xF)));
                  crs = aml_resource_template();
@@ -1840,6 +1844,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
      if (TPM_IS_CRB(tpm)) {
          dev = aml_device("TPM");
          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("MSFT0101")));
+        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR",
+                                      aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));
          crs = aml_resource_template();
          aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE,
                                             TPM_CRB_ADDR_SIZE, 
AML_READ_WRITE));
@@ -1847,6 +1853,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xf))); + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));
+
          tpm_build_ppi_acpi(tpm, dev);
aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
--
2.31.1



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]