[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] hw/hyperv/vmbus: Is it maintained?

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] hw/hyperv/vmbus: Is it maintained?
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:30:59 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0

On 11/6/21 20:28, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 06.11.2021 14:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> This is the 4th time I send this patch. Is the VMBus infrastructure
>> used / maintained? Should we deprecate & remove?
>>    $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/hyperv/vmbus.c -f
>> include/hw/hyperv/vmbus.h
>>    get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found
> There's an email thread at [1] explaining the reasons for having VMBus
> infrastructure last time such question was asked.
> In short: mere presence of a working VMBus is needed for some high-speed
> Windows debugging, also people are working on VMBus host device drivers.

Great. Do you mind adding an entry in MAINTAINERS to
cover these files, so we stop wondering about them?

> Your patch makes sense to me, so for it:
> Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>

Thank you.

> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20201009193919.GF7303@habkost.net/T/#u

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]