[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] QIOChannel: Add io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocop
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] QIOChannel: Add io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocopy callbacks |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:17:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20210205-852-339c0c |
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 04:56:11AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Adds io_async_writev and io_async_flush as optional callback to
> QIOChannelClass,
Are these names accurate?
> allowing the implementation of asynchronous writes by subclasses.
>
> How to use them:
> - Write data using qio_channel_writev_zerocopu(),
s/copu/copy/
> - Wait write completion with qio_channel_flush_zerocopy().
>
> Notes:
> As some zerocopy implementations work asynchronously, it's
> recommended to keep the write buffer untouched until the return of
> qio_channel_flush_zerocopy(), by the risk of sending an updated buffer
s/by/to avoid/
> instead of the one at the write.
>
> As the new callbacks are optional, if a subclass does not implement them,
> then:
> - io_async_writev will return -1,
> - io_async_flush will return 0 without changing anything.
Are these names accurate?
>
> Also, some functions like qio_channel_writev_full_all() were adapted to
> receive a flag parameter. That allows shared code between zerocopy and
> non-zerocopy writev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/io/channel.h | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> io/channel.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/io/channel.h b/include/io/channel.h
> index 88988979f8..e7d4e1521f 100644
> --- a/include/io/channel.h
> +++ b/include/io/channel.h
> @@ -32,12 +32,15 @@ OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(QIOChannel, QIOChannelClass,
>
> #define QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK -2
>
> +#define QIO_CHANNEL_WRITE_FLAG_ZEROCOPY 0x1
> +
> typedef enum QIOChannelFeature QIOChannelFeature;
>
> enum QIOChannelFeature {
> QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_FD_PASS,
> QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN,
> QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_LISTEN,
> + QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_WRITE_ZEROCOPY,
> };
>
>
> @@ -136,6 +139,12 @@ struct QIOChannelClass {
> IOHandler *io_read,
> IOHandler *io_write,
> void *opaque);
> + ssize_t (*io_writev_zerocopy)(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + const struct iovec *iov,
> + size_t niov,
> + Error **errp);
> + int (*io_flush_zerocopy)(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + Error **errp);
Indentation is off by one.
> };
>
> /* General I/O handling functions */
> @@ -222,12 +231,13 @@ ssize_t qio_channel_readv_full(QIOChannel *ioc,
>
>
> /**
> - * qio_channel_writev_full:
> + * qio_channel_writev_full_flags:
> * @ioc: the channel object
> * @iov: the array of memory regions to write data from
> * @niov: the length of the @iov array
> * @fds: an array of file handles to send
> * @nfds: number of file handles in @fds
> + * @flags: write flags (QIO_CHANNEL_WRITE_FLAG_*)
> * @errp: pointer to a NULL-initialized error object
> *
> * Write data to the IO channel, reading it from the
> @@ -242,6 +252,10 @@ ssize_t qio_channel_readv_full(QIOChannel *ioc,
> * guaranteed. If the channel is non-blocking and no
> * data can be sent, it will return QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK
> *
> + * If flag QIO_CHANNEL_WRITE_FLAG_ZEROCOPY is passed,
> + * function will return once each buffer was queued for
> + * sending.
This would be a good place to document the requirement to keep the
buffer unchanged until the zerocopy sequence completes.
> Error **errp);
>
> /**
> - * qio_channel_writev_full_all:
> + * qio_channel_writev_full_all_flags:
> * @ioc: the channel object
> * @iov: the array of memory regions to write data from
> * @niov: the length of the @iov array
> * @fds: an array of file handles to send
> * @nfds: number of file handles in @fds
> + * @flags: write flags (QIO_CHANNEL_WRITE_FLAG_*)
> * @errp: pointer to a NULL-initialized error object
> *
> *
> @@ -846,13 +868,58 @@ int qio_channel_readv_full_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
> * to be written, yielding from the current coroutine
> * if required.
> *
> + * If QIO_CHANNEL_WRITE_FLAG_ZEROCOPY is passed in flags,
> + * instead of waiting for all requested data to be written,
> + * this function will wait until it's all queued for writing.
Another good place to document restrictions on buffer stability.
> + *
> * Returns: 0 if all bytes were written, or -1 on error
> */
>
> -int qio_channel_writev_full_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
> - const struct iovec *iov,
> - size_t niov,
> - int *fds, size_t nfds,
> - Error **errp);
> +int qio_channel_writev_full_all_flags(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + const struct iovec *iov,
> + size_t niov,
> + int *fds, size_t nfds,
> + int flags, Error **errp);
> +#define qio_channel_writev_full_all(ioc, iov, niov, fds, nfds, errp) \
> + qio_channel_writev_full_all_flags(ioc, iov, niov, fds, nfds, 0, errp)
> +
> +/**
> + * qio_channel_writev_zerocopy:
> + * @ioc: the channel object
> + * @iov: the array of memory regions to write data from
> + * @niov: the length of the @iov array
> + * @errp: pointer to a NULL-initialized error object
> + *
> + * Behaves like qio_channel_writev_full_all_flags, but will write
> + * data asynchronously while avoiding unnecessary data copy.
> + * This function may return before any data is actually written,
> + * but should queue every buffer for writting.
writing
Another place to document buffer stability considerations.
> + *
> + * If at some point it's necessary wait for all data to be
s/wait/to wait/
> + * written, use qio_channel_flush_zerocopy().
> + *
> + * If zerocopy is not available, returns -1 and set errp.
> + */
> +
> +ssize_t qio_channel_writev_zerocopy(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + const struct iovec *iov,
> + size_t niov,
> + Error **errp);
> +
> +/**
> + * qio_channel_flush_zerocopy:
> + * @ioc: the channel object
> + * @errp: pointer to a NULL-initialized error object
> + *
> + * Will lock until every packet queued with
s/lock/block/
> + * qio_channel_writev_zerocopy() is sent, or return
> + * in case of any error.
> + *
> + * Returns -1 if any error is found, 0 otherwise.
> + * If not implemented, returns 0 without changing anything.
> + */
> +
> +int qio_channel_flush_zerocopy(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + Error **errp);
>
> #endif /* QIO_CHANNEL_H */
> diff --git a/io/channel.c b/io/channel.c
> index e8b019dc36..811c93ae23 100644
> --- a/io/channel.c
> +++ b/io/channel.c
> +int qio_channel_flush_zerocopy(QIOChannel *ioc,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + QIOChannelClass *klass = QIO_CHANNEL_GET_CLASS(ioc);
> +
> + if (!klass->io_flush_zerocopy ||
> + !qio_channel_has_feature(ioc, QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_WRITE_ZEROCOPY)) {
> + return 0;
Matches your documentation, but an ideal app should not be trying to
flush if the write failed in the first place. So wouldn't it be
better to return -1 or even abort() on a coding error?
> + }
> +
> + return klass->io_flush_zerocopy(ioc, errp);
> +}
> +
> +
> static void qio_channel_restart_read(void *opaque)
> {
> QIOChannel *ioc = opaque;
> --
> 2.33.0
>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[PATCH v4 2/3] QIOChannelSocket: Implement io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocopy for CONFIG_LINUX, Leonardo Bras, 2021/10/09