Re: [PATCH v3 05/27] linux-user/arm: Implement setup_sigtramp

[Peter Maydell]

On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 17:59, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Update the trampoline code to match the kernel: this uses
> sp-relative accesses rather than pc-relative.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

These functions must write at most 8 bytes:

> +static void write_arm_sigreturn(uint32_t *rc, int syscall)
> +{
> +    __put_user(ARM_MOV_R7_IMM(syscall), rc);
> +    __put_user(ARM_SWI_SYS(syscall), rc + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void write_thumb_sigreturn(uint32_t *rc, int syscall)
> +{
> +    __put_user(THUMB_SWI_SYS << 16 | THUMB_MOVS_R7_IMM(syscall), rc);
> +}
>
>  /*
> - * Stub needed to make sure the FD register (r9) contains the right
> - * value.
> + * Stub needed to make sure the FD register (r9) contains the right value.
> + * Use the same instruction sequence as the kernel.
>   */
> -static const unsigned long sigreturn_fdpic_codes[3] = {
> -    0xe59fc004, /* ldr r12, [pc, #4] to read function descriptor */
> -    0xe59c9004, /* ldr r9, [r12, #4] to setup GOT */
> -    0xe59cf000  /* ldr pc, [r12] to jump into restorer */
> -};

...and these must write at most 12 bytes. But nothing states
or asserts that.

> +static void write_arm_fdpic_sigreturn(uint32_t *rc, int ofs)
> +{
> +    assert(ofs <= 0xfff);
> +    __put_user(0xe59d3000 | ofs, rc + 0);   /* ldr r3, [sp, #ofs] */
> +    __put_user(0xe8930908, rc + 1);         /* ldm r3, { r3, r9 } */
> +    __put_user(0xe12fff13, rc + 2);         /* bx  r3 */
> +}
>
> -static const unsigned long sigreturn_fdpic_thumb_codes[3] = {
> -    0xc008f8df, /* ldr r12, [pc, #8] to read function descriptor */
> -    0x9004f8dc, /* ldr r9, [r12, #4] to setup GOT */
> -    0xf000f8dc  /* ldr pc, [r12] to jump into restorer */
> -};
> +static void write_thumb_fdpic_sigreturn(void *vrc, int ofs)
> +{
> +    uint16_t *rc = vrc;
> +
> +    assert((ofs & ~0x3fc) == 0);
> +    __put_user(0x9b00 | (ofs >> 2), rc + 0);      /* ldr r3, [sp, #ofs] */
> +    __put_user(0xcb0c, rc + 1);                   /* ldm r3, { r2, r3 } */
> +    __put_user(0x4699, rc + 2);                   /* mov r9, r3 */
> +    __put_user(0x4710, rc + 3);                   /* bx  r2 */
> +}
>

> -            retcode = rc_addr + thumb;
> +            /* Each trampoline variant consumes a 12-byte slot. */
> +            retcode = sigreturn_fdpic_tramp + retcode_idx * 12 + thumb;
>          } else {
>              retcode = ka->sa_restorer;
>          }
>      } else {

> -
> -        retcode = rc_addr + thumb;
> +        /* Each trampoline variant consumes 8-byte slot. */
> +        retcode = default_sigreturn + retcode_idx * 8 + thumb;

These 12 and 8 magic numbers correspond to the maximum sequence sizes
above...

> +void setup_sigtramp(abi_ulong sigtramp_page)
> +{
> +    enum {
> +        SIGFRAME_FDPIC_OFS = offsetof(struct sigframe, retcode[3]),
> +        RT_SIGFRAME_FDPIC_OFS = offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, retcode[3]),
> +    };
> +
> +    uint32_t total_size = 4 * 8 + 4 * 12;
> +    uint32_t *tramp = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, sigtramp_page, total_size, 0);
> +    uint32_t i = 0;
> +
> +    assert(tramp != NULL);
> +
> +    default_sigreturn = sigtramp_page;
> +    write_arm_sigreturn(&tramp[i], TARGET_NR_sigreturn);
> +    i += 2;
> +    write_thumb_sigreturn(&tramp[i], TARGET_NR_sigreturn);
> +    i += 2;
> +    write_arm_sigreturn(&tramp[i], TARGET_NR_rt_sigreturn);
> +    i += 2;
> +    write_thumb_sigreturn(&tramp[i], TARGET_NR_rt_sigreturn);
> +    i += 2;

...and these "+=2" and the "+=3" later do as well, but with
a count of 32-bit words rather than bytes. I think it would be
useful to at least have some defined constants for the lengths
rather than hard-coded 8,12,2,3, and comments that the write_
functions must not write more than however-many bytes.

> +
> +    /*
> +     * FDPIC require trampolines to call sa_restorer, and different
> +     * from the pc-relative versions we write to the stack.
> +     *
> +     * ARM versions use:
> +     *    ldr   r3, [sp, #ofs]
> +     *    ldr   r9, [r3, #4]
> +     *    ldr   pc, [r3, #0]

This comment doesn't match the code that write_arm_fdpic_sigreturn()
now generates. The "different from the pc-relative versions we
write from the stack" bit doesn't seem to be right either, given
we call the same functions in both places to write the code.

> +     *
> +     * Thumb versions use:
> +     *    ldr   r3, [sp, #ofs]
> +     *    ldmia r3, {r2, r3}
> +     *    mov   r9, r3
> +     *    bx    r2
> +     */
> +    sigreturn_fdpic_tramp = sigtramp_page + i * 4;
> +
> +    /* ARM sigframe */
> +    write_arm_fdpic_sigreturn(tramp + i,
> +                              offsetof(struct sigframe, retcode[3]));
> +    i += 3;
> +
> +    /* Thumb sigframe */
> +    write_thumb_fdpic_sigreturn(tramp + i,
> +                                offsetof(struct sigframe, retcode[3]));
> +    i += 3;
> +
> +    /* ARM rt_sigframe */
> +    write_arm_fdpic_sigreturn(tramp + i,
> +                              offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, retcode[3]));
> +    i += 3;
> +
> +    /* Thumb rt_sigframe */
> +    write_thumb_fdpic_sigreturn(tramp + i,
> +                                offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, retcode[3]));
> +    i += 3;
> +
> +    assert(i * 4 == total_size);
> +    unlock_user(tramp, sigtramp_page, total_size);
> +}
> --
> 2.25.1

thanks
-- PMM