qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v3 22/27] linux-user/riscv: Implement setup_sigtramp


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: [PATCH v3 22/27] linux-user/riscv: Implement setup_sigtramp
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:59:21 -0400

Create and record the rt signal trampoline.

This fixes a bug wrt libgcc fallback unwinding.  It expects
the stack pointer to point to the siginfo_t, whereas we had
inexplicably placed our private signal trampoline at the start
of the signal frame instead of the end.  Now moot because we
have removed it from the stack frame entirely.

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 linux-user/riscv/target_signal.h |  2 ++
 linux-user/riscv/signal.c        | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/riscv/target_signal.h b/linux-user/riscv/target_signal.h
index f113ba9a55..3e36fddc9d 100644
--- a/linux-user/riscv/target_signal.h
+++ b/linux-user/riscv/target_signal.h
@@ -15,4 +15,6 @@ typedef struct target_sigaltstack {
 
 #include "../generic/signal.h"
 
+#define TARGET_ARCH_HAS_SIGTRAMP_PAGE 1
+
 #endif /* RISCV_TARGET_SIGNAL_H */
diff --git a/linux-user/riscv/signal.c b/linux-user/riscv/signal.c
index f7f33bc90a..a0f9542ce3 100644
--- a/linux-user/riscv/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/riscv/signal.c
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct target_ucontext {
 };
 
 struct target_rt_sigframe {
-    uint32_t tramp[2]; /* not in kernel, which uses VDSO instead */
     struct target_siginfo info;
     struct target_ucontext uc;
 };
@@ -105,12 +104,6 @@ static void setup_ucontext(struct target_ucontext *uc,
     setup_sigcontext(&uc->uc_mcontext, env);
 }
 
-static inline void install_sigtramp(uint32_t *tramp)
-{
-    __put_user(0x08b00893, tramp + 0);  /* li a7, 139 = __NR_rt_sigreturn */
-    __put_user(0x00000073, tramp + 1);  /* ecall */
-}
-
 void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
                     target_siginfo_t *info,
                     target_sigset_t *set, CPURISCVState *env)
@@ -127,14 +120,13 @@ void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
 
     setup_ucontext(&frame->uc, env, set);
     tswap_siginfo(&frame->info, info);
-    install_sigtramp(frame->tramp);
 
     env->pc = ka->_sa_handler;
     env->gpr[xSP] = frame_addr;
     env->gpr[xA0] = sig;
     env->gpr[xA1] = frame_addr + offsetof(struct target_rt_sigframe, info);
     env->gpr[xA2] = frame_addr + offsetof(struct target_rt_sigframe, uc);
-    env->gpr[xRA] = frame_addr + offsetof(struct target_rt_sigframe, tramp);
+    env->gpr[xRA] = default_rt_sigreturn;
 
     return;
 
@@ -203,3 +195,15 @@ badframe:
     force_sig(TARGET_SIGSEGV);
     return 0;
 }
+
+void setup_sigtramp(abi_ulong sigtramp_page)
+{
+    uint32_t *tramp = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, sigtramp_page, 8, 0);
+    assert(tramp != NULL);
+
+    __put_user(0x08b00893, tramp + 0);  /* li a7, 139 = __NR_rt_sigreturn */
+    __put_user(0x00000073, tramp + 1);  /* ecall */
+
+    default_rt_sigreturn = sigtramp_page;
+    unlock_user(tramp, sigtramp_page, 8);
+}
-- 
2.25.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]