[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH REBASED v5 2/2] spapr: nvdimm: Introduce spapr-nvdimm device
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH REBASED v5 2/2] spapr: nvdimm: Introduce spapr-nvdimm device |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:32:27 +1000 |
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 09:57:31PM -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> If the device backend is not persistent memory for the nvdimm, there is
> need for explicit IO flushes on the backend to ensure persistence.
>
> On SPAPR, the issue is addressed by adding a new hcall to request for
> an explicit flush from the guest when the backend is not pmem. So, the
> approach here is to convey when the hcall flush is required in a device
> tree property. The guest once it knows the device backend is not pmem,
> makes the hcall whenever flush is required.
>
> To set the device tree property, the patch introduces a new papr specific
> device type inheriting the nvdimm device. When the backend doesn't have
> pmem="yes", the device tree property "ibm,hcall-flush-required" is set,
> and the guest makes hcall H_SCM_FLUSH requesting for an explicit flush.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c | 46
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
> index 4f8931ab15..4dc7c3f147 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ bool spapr_nvdimm_validate(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm,
> {
> const MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(hotplug_dev);
> const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> + PCDIMMDevice *dimm = PC_DIMM(nvdimm);
> + MemoryRegion *mr = host_memory_backend_get_memory(dimm->hostmem);
> g_autofree char *uuidstr = NULL;
> QemuUUID uuid;
> int ret;
> @@ -91,6 +93,14 @@ bool spapr_nvdimm_validate(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm,
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(nvdimm), TYPE_SPAPR_NVDIMM) &&
> + (memory_region_get_fd(mr) < 0)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "spapr-nvdimm device requires the "
> + "memdev %s to be of memory-backend-file type",
> +
> object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(dimm->hostmem)));
It's not obvious to me why the spapr nvdimm device has an additional
restriction here over the regular nvdimm device.
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -162,6 +172,21 @@ static int spapr_dt_nvdimm(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> void *fdt,
> "operating-system")));
> _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, child_offset, "ibm,cache-flush-required", NULL,
> 0));
>
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(nvdimm), TYPE_SPAPR_NVDIMM)) {
> + bool is_pmem = false;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIBPMEM
> + PCDIMMDevice *dimm = PC_DIMM(nvdimm);
> + HostMemoryBackend *hostmem = dimm->hostmem;
> +
> + is_pmem = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(hostmem), "pmem",
> + &error_abort);
Presenting to the guest a property of the backend worries me
slightly. How the backends are synchronized between the source and
destination is out of scope for qemu: is there any possibility that we
could migrate from a host where the backend is pmem to one where it is
not (or the reverse).
I think at the least we want a property on the spapr-nvdimm object
which will override what's presented to the guest (which, yes, might
mean lying to the guest). I think that could be important for
testing, if nothing else.
> +#endif
> + if (!is_pmem) {
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, child_offset, "ibm,hcall-flush-required",
> + NULL, 0));
> + }
> + }
> +
> return child_offset;
> }
>
> @@ -585,7 +610,16 @@ static target_ulong h_scm_flush(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> }
>
> dimm = PC_DIMM(drc->dev);
> + if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dimm), TYPE_SPAPR_NVDIMM)) {
> + return H_PARAMETER;
> + }
Hmm. If you're going to make flushes specific to spapr nvdimms, you
could put the queue of pending flushes into the spapr-nvdimm object,
rather than having a global list in the machine.
> +
> backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(dimm->hostmem);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIBPMEM
> + if (object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(backend), "pmem", &error_abort)) {
> + return H_UNSUPPORTED;
Could you make this not be UNSUPPORTED, but instead fake the flush for
the pmem device? Either as a no-op, or simulating the guest invoking
the right cpu cache flushes? That seems like it would be more useful:
that way users who don't care too much about performance could just
always do a flush hcall and not have to have another path for the
"real" pmem case.
> + }
> +#endif
> fd = memory_region_get_fd(&backend->mr);
>
> if (fd < 0) {
> @@ -766,3 +800,15 @@ static void spapr_scm_register_types(void)
> }
>
> type_init(spapr_scm_register_types)
> +
> +static TypeInfo spapr_nvdimm_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_SPAPR_NVDIMM,
> + .parent = TYPE_NVDIMM,
> +};
> +
> +static void spapr_nvdimm_register_types(void)
> +{
> + type_register_static(&spapr_nvdimm_info);
> +}
> +
> +type_init(spapr_nvdimm_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h
> index 24d8e37b33..fb4e56418e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
> #include "hw/mem/nvdimm.h"
> #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>
> +#define TYPE_SPAPR_NVDIMM "spapr-nvdimm"
> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(SpaprNVDIMMDevice, SPAPR_NVDIMM)
> +
> +typedef struct SpaprNVDIMMDevice SpaprNVDIMMDevice;
> typedef struct SpaprDrc SpaprDrc;
> typedef struct SpaprMachineState SpaprMachineState;
>
>
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH REBASED v5 2/2] spapr: nvdimm: Introduce spapr-nvdimm device,
David Gibson <=