qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v2 1/1] hw/arm/aspeed: Initialize AST2600 UART clock selection re


From: pdel
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] hw/arm/aspeed: Initialize AST2600 UART clock selection registers
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:40:23 -0700

From: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>

UART5 is typically used as the default debug UART on the AST2600, but
UART1 is also designed to be a debug UART. All the AST2600 UART's have
semi-configurable clock rates through registers in the System Control
Unit (SCU), but only UART5 works out of the box with zero-initialized
values. The rest of the UART's expect a few of the registers to be
initialized to non-zero values, or else the clock rate calculation will
yield zero or undefined (due to a divide-by-zero).

For reference, the U-Boot clock rate driver here shows the calculation:

    
https://github.com/facebook/openbmc-uboot/blob/15f7e0dc01d8/drivers/clk/aspeed/clk_ast2600.c#L357

To summarize, UART5 allows selection from 4 rates: 24 MHz, 192 MHz, 24 /
13 MHz, and 192 / 13 MHz. The other UART's allow selecting either the
"low" rate (UARTCLK) or the "high" rate (HUARTCLK). UARTCLK and HUARTCLK
are configurable themselves:

    UARTCLK = UXCLK * R / (N * 2)
    HUARTCLK = HUXCLK * HR / (HN * 2)

UXCLK and HUXCLK are also configurable, and depend on the APLL and/or
HPLL clock rates, which also derive from complicated calculations. Long
story short, there's lots of multiplication and division from
configurable registers, and most of these registers are zero-initialized
in QEMU, which at best is unexpected and at worst causes this clock rate
driver to hang from divide-by-zero's. This can also be difficult to
diagnose, because it may cause U-Boot to hang before serial console
initialization completes, requiring intervention from gdb.

This change just initializes all of these registers with default values
from the datasheet.

To test this, I used Facebook's AST2600 OpenBMC image for "fuji", with
the following diff applied (because fuji uses UART1 for console output,
not UART5).

  @@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
Error **errp)
       }

      /* UART - attach an 8250 to the IO space as our UART5 */
  -    serial_mm_init(get_system_memory(), sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_UART5], 2,
  -                   aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_DEV_UART5),
  +    serial_mm_init(get_system_memory(), sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_UART1], 2,
  +                   aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_DEV_UART1),
                    38400, serial_hd(0), DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);

       /* I2C */

Without these clock rate registers being initialized, U-Boot hangs in
the clock rate driver from a divide-by-zero, because the UART1 clock
rate register reads return zero, and there's no console output. After
initializing them with default values, fuji boots successfully.

Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
---
 hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c b/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
index 05edebedeb..a95dca65f2 100644
--- a/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
+++ b/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@
 #define AST2600_CLK_SEL3          TO_REG(0x308)
 #define AST2600_CLK_SEL4          TO_REG(0x310)
 #define AST2600_CLK_SEL5          TO_REG(0x314)
+#define AST2600_UARTCLK_PARAM     TO_REG(0x338)
+#define AST2600_HUARTCLK_PARAM    TO_REG(0x33C)
 #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1         TO_REG(0x500)
 #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1_CLR     TO_REG(0x504)
 #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1_PROT    TO_REG(0x508)
@@ -681,6 +683,8 @@ static const uint32_t 
ast2600_a3_resets[ASPEED_AST2600_SCU_NR_REGS] = {
     [AST2600_CLK_SEL3]          = 0x00000000,
     [AST2600_CLK_SEL4]          = 0xF3F40000,
     [AST2600_CLK_SEL5]          = 0x30000000,
+    [AST2600_UARTCLK_PARAM]     = 0x00014506,
+    [AST2600_HUARTCLK_PARAM]    = 0x000145C0,
     [AST2600_CHIP_ID0]          = 0x1234ABCD,
     [AST2600_CHIP_ID1]          = 0x88884444,
 };
-- 
2.30.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]