qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] RFC: build-sys: drop dtc submodule


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: build-sys: drop dtc submodule
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:34:59 +0400

Hi

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:11 AM David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:11:17AM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:00 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 at 20:55, Marc-André Lureau
> > <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > fdt_check_full was added in 1.4.7:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git/tag/?h=v1.4.7
> > >
> > > Only ubuntu appears to be lagging a bit behind. I wonder if they would
> > consider an update.
> >
> > I doubt it. You would need to wait until that actually falls off
> > our supported list. You also have a couple of years to wait until
> > Debian oldstable is no longer on our supported list.
> >
> > Maybe, I don't know why debian oldstable would have received a new version
> plus fixes, and not ubuntu.
>
> It seems we could have our own fallback copy of fdt_check_full() though..
> I'll give that a try.

We could, but fdt_check_full() is actually a pretty complex function.


Yeah, that would be used for those who don't have >= 1.4.7.

Alternatively we could lower the fdt_check_full to fdt_check_header in this case? It seems it is used to verify the DT from SLOF. It may be trusted I suppose, or a malformed DT may only impact the guest?
 
--
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


--
Marc-André Lureau

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]