|
From: | Andrew Melnichenko |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio-net: Added property to load eBPF RSS with fds. |
Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:18:09 +0300 |
I wonder if it's better to use separated properties instead of implying
an order here?
在 2021/7/13 下午11:37, Andrew Melnychenko 写道:
> eBPF RSS program and maps now may be passed during initialization.
> Initially was implemented for libvirt to launch qemu without permissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com>
> ---
> hw/net/virtio-net.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> index bd7958b9f0..0602b1772e 100644
> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "monitor/qdev.h"
> +#include "monitor/monitor.h"
> #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> #include "net_rx_pkt.h"
> #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
> @@ -1223,14 +1224,81 @@ static void virtio_net_detach_epbf_rss(VirtIONet *n)
> virtio_net_attach_ebpf_to_backend(n->nic, -1);
> }
>
> -static bool virtio_net_load_ebpf(VirtIONet *n)
> +static int virtio_net_get_ebpf_rss_fds(char *str, char *fds[], int nfds)
> {
> - if (!virtio_net_attach_ebpf_to_backend(n->nic, -1)) {
> - /* backend does't support steering ebpf */
> + char *ptr = str;
> + char *cur = NULL;
> + size_t len = strlen(str);
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + for (; i < nfds && ptr < str + len;) {
> + cur = strchr(ptr, ':');
> +
> + if (cur == NULL) {
> + fds[i] = g_strdup(ptr);
> + } else {
> + fds[i] = g_strndup(ptr, cur - ptr);
> + }
> +
> + i++;
> + if (cur == NULL) {
> + break;
> + } else {
> + ptr = cur + 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +
> +static bool virtio_net_load_ebpf_fds(VirtIONet *n)
> +{
> + char *fds_strs[EBPF_RSS_MAX_FDS];
> + int fds[EBPF_RSS_MAX_FDS];
> + int nfds;
> + int ret = false;
> + Error *errp;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + if (n == NULL || !n->ebpf_rss_fds) {
> return false;
> }
>
> - return ebpf_rss_load(&n->ebpf_rss);
> + nfds = virtio_net_get_ebpf_rss_fds(n->ebpf_rss_fds,
> + fds_strs, EBPF_RSS_MAX_FDS);
> + for (i = 0; i < nfds; i++) {
> + fds[i] = monitor_fd_param(monitor_cur(), fds_strs[i], &errp);
> + }
> +
> + if (nfds == EBPF_RSS_MAX_FDS) {
> + ret = ebpf_rss_load_fds(&n->ebpf_rss, fds[0], fds[1], fds[2], fds[3]);
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nfds; i++) {
> + close(fds[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nfds; i++) {
> + g_free(fds_strs[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool virtio_net_load_ebpf(VirtIONet *n)
> +{
> + bool ret = true;
> +
> + if (virtio_net_attach_ebpf_to_backend(n->nic, -1)) {
> + if (!(n->ebpf_rss_fds
> + && virtio_net_load_ebpf_fds(n))) {
> + ret = ebpf_rss_load(&n->ebpf_rss);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void virtio_net_unload_ebpf(VirtIONet *n)
> @@ -3605,6 +3673,7 @@ static Property virtio_net_properties[] = {
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("hash", VirtIONet, host_features,
> VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT, false),
> + DEFINE_PROP_STRING("ebpf_rss_fds", VirtIONet, ebpf_rss_fds),
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("guest_rsc_ext", VirtIONet, host_features,
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("rsc_interval", VirtIONet, rsc_timeout,
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h
> index 824a69c23f..993f2f3036 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct VirtIONet {
> VirtioNetRssData rss_data;
> struct NetRxPkt *rx_pkt;
> struct EBPFRSSContext ebpf_rss;
> + char *ebpf_rss_fds;
I wonder if it's better to use separated properties instead of implying
an order here?
E.g "program_fd", "key_map_fd", "indirection_table_map_fd" etc.
Thanks
> };
>
> void virtio_net_set_netclient_name(VirtIONet *n, const char *name,
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |