[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for-6.2 00/43] Unaligned accesses for user-only
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH for-6.2 00/43] Unaligned accesses for user-only |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:14:16 +0100 |
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 01:50, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> This began with Peter wanting a cpu_ldst.h interface that can handle
> alignment info for Arm M-profile system mode, which will also compile
> for user-only without ifdefs. This is patch 32.
>
> Once I had that interface, I thought I might as well enforce the
> requested alignment in user-only. There are plenty of cases where
> we ought to have been doing that for quite a while. This took rather
> more work than I imagined to start.
>
> So far only x86 host has been fully converted to handle unaligned
> operations in user-only mode. I'll get to the others later. But
> the added testcase is fairly broad, and caught lots of bugs and/or
> missing code between target/ and linux-user/.
>
> Notes:
> * For target/i386 we have no way to signal SIGBUS from user-only.
> In theory we could go through do_unaligned_access in system mode,
> via #AC. But we don't even implement that control in tcg, probably
> because no one ever sets it. The cmpxchg16b insn requires alignment,
> but raises #GP, which maps to SIGSEGV.
>
> * For target/s390x we have no way to signal SIGBUS from user-only.
> The atomic operations raise PGM_SPECIFICATION, which the linux
> kernel maps to SIGILL.
>
> * I think target/hexagon should be setting TARGET_ALIGNED_ONLY=y.
> In the meantime, all memory accesses are allowed to be unaligned.
Could you include suitable updates to docs/devel/loads-stores.rst
as well, please?
thanks
-- PMM
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH for-6.2 00/43] Unaligned accesses for user-only,
Peter Maydell <=