qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: mark correct memory region range dirty when clea


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] tpm: mark correct memory region range dirty when clearing RAM
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:58:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

On 26.07.21 18:57, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:03:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
We might not start at the beginning of the memory region. Let's
calculate the offset into the memory region via the difference in the
host addresses.

Acked-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: ffab1be70692 ("tpm: clear RAM when "memory overwrite" requested")
Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
  hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
index 362edcc5c9..f243d9d0f6 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
@@ -30,11 +30,14 @@ void tpm_ppi_reset(TPMPPI *tpmppi)
          guest_phys_blocks_init(&guest_phys_blocks);
          guest_phys_blocks_append(&guest_phys_blocks);
          QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &guest_phys_blocks.head, next) {
+            hwaddr mr_offs = (uint8_t *)memory_region_get_ram_ptr(block->mr) -
+                             block->host_addr;

Didn't look closely previous - should it be reversed instead?

   block->host_addr - memory_region_get_ram_ptr(block->mr)

Of course it should :(

Thanks! :)

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]