[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] qtest/hyperv: Introduce a simple hyper-v test
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] qtest/hyperv: Introduce a simple hyper-v test |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:46:22 +0200 |
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 02:55:28PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> For the beginning, just test 'hv-passthrough' and a couple of custom
> Hyper-V enlightenments configurations through QMP. Later, it would
> be great to complement this by checking CPUID values from within the
> guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
> - Changes since "[PATCH v8 0/9] i386: KVM: expand Hyper-V features early":
> make the test SKIP correctly when KVM is not present.
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qtest/meson.build | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 148153d74f5b..c1afd744edca 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1576,6 +1576,7 @@ F: hw/isa/apm.c
> F: include/hw/isa/apm.h
> F: tests/unit/test-x86-cpuid.c
> F: tests/qtest/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c
> +F: tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c
>
> PC Chipset
> M: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c b/tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2155e5d90970
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/qtest/hyperv-test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
> +/*
> + * Hyper-V emulation CPU feature test cases
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat Inc.
> + * Authors:
> + * Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/bitops.h"
> +#include "libqos/libqtest.h"
> +#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
> +#include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h"
> +
> +#define MACHINE_KVM "-machine pc-q35-5.2 -accel kvm "
> +#define QUERY_HEAD "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
> + " 'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
> +#define QUERY_TAIL "}}"
> +
> +static bool kvm_enabled(QTestState *qts)
> +{
> + QDict *resp, *qdict;
> + bool enabled;
> +
> + resp = qtest_qmp(qts, "{ 'execute': 'query-kvm' }");
> + g_assert(qdict_haskey(resp, "return"));
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
> + g_assert(qdict_haskey(qdict, "enabled"));
> + enabled = qdict_get_bool(qdict, "enabled");
> + qobject_unref(resp);
> +
> + return enabled;
> +}
> +
> +static bool kvm_has_cap(int cap)
> +{
> + int fd = open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ioctl(fd, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, cap);
> +
> + close(fd);
> +
> + return ret > 0;
> +}
> +
> +static QDict *do_query_no_props(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
> +{
> + return qtest_qmp(qts, QUERY_HEAD "'model': { 'name': %s }"
> + QUERY_TAIL, cpu_type);
> +}
> +
> +static bool resp_has_props(QDict *resp)
> +{
> + QDict *qdict;
> +
> + g_assert(resp);
> +
> + if (!qdict_haskey(resp, "return")) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
> +
> + if (!qdict_haskey(qdict, "model")) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "model");
> +
> + return qdict_haskey(qdict, "props");
> +}
> +
> +static QDict *resp_get_props(QDict *resp)
> +{
> + QDict *qdict;
> +
> + g_assert(resp);
> + g_assert(resp_has_props(resp));
> +
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(resp, "return");
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "model");
> + qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "props");
> +
> + return qdict;
> +}
> +
> +static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
> +{
> + QDict *props;
> +
> + g_assert(resp);
> + g_assert(resp_has_props(resp));
> + props = resp_get_props(resp);
> + g_assert(qdict_get(props, feature));
> + return qdict_get_bool(props, feature);
> +}
> +
> +#define assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
> +({ \
> + QDict *_resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type); \
> + g_assert(_resp); \
> + g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp)); \
> + g_assert(qdict_get(resp_get_props(_resp), feature)); \
> + qobject_unref(_resp); \
> +})
> +
> +#define resp_assert_feature(resp, feature, expected_value) \
> +({ \
> + QDict *_props; \
> + \
> + g_assert(_resp); \
> + g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp)); \
> + _props = resp_get_props(_resp); \
> + g_assert(qdict_get(_props, feature)); \
> + g_assert(qdict_get_bool(_props, feature) == (expected_value)); \
> +})
> +
> +#define assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value) \
> +({ \
> + QDict *_resp; \
> + \
> + _resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type); \
> + g_assert(_resp); \
> + resp_assert_feature(_resp, feature, expected_value); \
> + qobject_unref(_resp); \
> +})
> +
> +#define assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
> + assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, true)
> +
> +#define assert_has_feature_disabled(qts, cpu_type, feature) \
> + assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, false)
All the code above looks like stuff we should share with other tests.
Shouldn't we factor that stuff out of those test(s) into some include?
Thanks,
drew