Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] linux-user/s390x: signal with SIGFPE on compare-and-trap

[Richard Henderson]

On 7/9/21 7:23 AM, jonathan.albrecht wrote:
> > As a general comment, I think a single switch over DXC would be
> > cleaner for both kernel and qemu.  It seems like giving different
> > si_code for e.g. "0x40 IEEE division by zero" and "0x43 Simulated IEEE
> > division by zero" is actively incorrect.
> I went over the DXC section and I see what you mean about the si_codes
> for simulated IEEE exceptions. I'll plan on handling those the same as
> non-simulated IEEE if no objections.

Only if you plan on submitting a similar patch for the kernel.
Otherwise, qemu would not match the kernel abi.


r~