qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 04/53] tests: acpi: q35: test for x2APIC entries in SRAT


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/53] tests: acpi: q35: test for x2APIC entries in SRAT
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:45:37 -0400

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:17:28AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Set -smp 1,maxcpus=288 to test for ACPI code that
> deal with CPUs with large APIC ID (>255).
> 
> PS:
> Test requires KVM and in-kernel irqchip support,
> so skip test if KVM is not available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

Why don't we add a new test? Why change an existing one?
And I'd prefer kvm in the name since it's kvm specific.
E.g. kvmnumamem.


> ---
> v2:
>   - switch to qtest_has_accel() API
> 
> CC: thuth@redhat.com
> CC: lvivier@redhat.com
> ---
>  tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> index 51d3a4e239..ca496819fa 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static void test_acpi_piix4_tcg_nohpet(void)
>      free_test_data(&data);
>  }
>  
> -static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_numamem(void)
> +static void test_acpi_q35_kvm_numamem(void)
>  {
>      test_data data;
>  
> @@ -1029,7 +1029,9 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_numamem(void)
>      data.machine = MACHINE_Q35;
>      data.variant = ".numamem";
>      test_acpi_one(" -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M"
> -                  " -numa node -numa node,memdev=ram0", &data);
> +                  " -numa node -numa node,memdev=ram0"
> +                  " -machine kernel-irqchip=on -smp 1,maxcpus=288"
> +                   , &data);
>      free_test_data(&data);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1506,6 +1508,7 @@ static void test_acpi_oem_fields_virt(void)
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
>      const char *arch = qtest_get_arch();
> +    const bool has_kvm = qtest_has_accel("kvm");
>      int ret;
>  
>      g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> @@ -1536,7 +1539,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/memhp", test_acpi_piix4_tcg_memhp);
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/memhp", test_acpi_q35_tcg_memhp);
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/numamem", test_acpi_piix4_tcg_numamem);
> -        qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/numamem", test_acpi_q35_tcg_numamem);
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/nosmm", test_acpi_piix4_tcg_nosmm);
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/smm-compat",
>                         test_acpi_piix4_tcg_smm_compat);
> @@ -1561,6 +1563,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>          if (strcmp(arch, "x86_64") == 0) {
>              qtest_add_func("acpi/microvm/pcie", test_acpi_microvm_pcie_tcg);
>          }
> +        if (has_kvm) {
> +            qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/numamem", test_acpi_q35_kvm_numamem);
> +        }
>      } else if (strcmp(arch, "aarch64") == 0) {
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/virt", test_acpi_virt_tcg);
>          qtest_add_func("acpi/virt/numamem", test_acpi_virt_tcg_numamem);
> -- 
> 2.27.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]