qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v3] ui/gtk: New -display gtk option 'full-screen-on-monitor'.


From: Khor, Swee Aun
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] ui/gtk: New -display gtk option 'full-screen-on-monitor'.
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:51:43 +0000

Thanks Gerd. I will submit another patch using PRId64 In warn_report. 

Regards,
SweeAun

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> 
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 4:49 PM
To: Khor, Swee Aun <swee.aun.khor@intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; armbru@redhat.com; eblake@redhat.com; Romli, Khairul 
Anuar <khairul.anuar.romli@intel.com>; Kasireddy, Vivek 
<vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>; Mazlan, Hazwan Arif <hazwan.arif.mazlan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ui/gtk: New -display gtk option 
'full-screen-on-monitor'.

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:56:28AM +0000, Khor, Swee Aun wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
> I am able to compile the code without error with my v3 patch. I don't see my 
> patch showing up in https://patchew.org/QEMU/ , is it due to this compilation 
> error?
> 
> I tried to change from %ld -> %lld but I encountered compilation error this 
> time. 
> 
> ../ui/gtk.c: In function 'gtk_display_init':
> ../ui/gtk.c:2300:25: error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long 
> int', but argument 2 has type 'int64_t' {aka 'long int'} [-Werror=format=]
>  2300 |             warn_report("Failed to enable full screen on monitor 
> %lld. "
>       |                         
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ......
>  2303 |                         opts->u.gtk.full_screen_on_monitor, 
> monitor_n);
>       |                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                    |
>       |                                    int64_t {aka long int}
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

stdint.h also has #defines for printing integers (PRI{x,d}{8,16,32,64}), they 
make sure the correct format string is used.

PRId64 would be the one for int64_t

take care,
  Gerd




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]