qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [RFC v1] virtio/vsock: add two more queues for datagram types


From: Jiang Wang .
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v1] virtio/vsock: add two more queues for datagram types
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:29:40 -0700

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:40 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:14:24AM +0000, Jiang Wang wrote:
> >Datagram sockets are connectionless and unreliable.
> >The sender does not know the capacity of the receiver
> >and may send more packets than the receiver can handle.
> >
> >Add two more dedicate virtqueues for datagram sockets,
> >so that it will not unfairly steal resources from
> >stream and future connection-oriented sockets.
> >
> >The virtio spec patch is here:
> >https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg50027.html
> >
> >Here is the link for the linux kernel git repo with patches
> >to support dgram sockets:
> >https://github.com/Jiang1155/linux/tree/vsock-dgram-v1
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com>
> >---
> > configure                                     | 13 +++++++++++++
> > hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c                | 11 ++++++++++-
> > hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c                       |  8 +++++---
> > include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.h        | 10 +++++++++-
> > include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_vsock.h |  3 +++
> > meson.build                                   |  1 +
> > 6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/configure b/configure
> >index 9f016b06b5..6455b283a5 100755
> >--- a/configure
> >+++ b/configure
> >@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ vhost_net="$default_feature"
> > vhost_crypto="$default_feature"
> > vhost_scsi="$default_feature"
> > vhost_vsock="$default_feature"
> >+vhost_vsock_dgram="no"
> > vhost_user="no"
> > vhost_user_blk_server="auto"
> > vhost_user_fs="$default_feature"
> >@@ -1272,6 +1273,10 @@ for opt do
> >   ;;
> >   --enable-vhost-vsock) vhost_vsock="yes"
> >   ;;
> >+  --disable-vhost-vsock-dgram) vhost_vsock_dgram="no"
> >+  ;;
> >+  --enable-vhost-vsock-dgram) vhost_vsock_dgram="yes"
> >+  ;;
>
> I don't think we should add a configuration option to enable/disable the
> dgram support at build time.
>
> I think we should do it at runtime looking at the features negiotated.
>
> Take a look at virtio_net_set_multiqueue().

Got it. Will check. Thanks.

> Thanks,
> Stefano
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]