Re: [PATCH] Add Connor Kuehl as reviewer for AMD SEV

[Connor Kuehl]

On 6/8/21 3:10 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Connor Kuehl wrote:
>> It may not be appropriate for me to take over as a maintainer at this time,
>> but I would consider myself familiar with AMD SEV and what this code is
>> meant to be doing as part of a VMM for launching SEV-protected guests.
>>
>> To that end, I would be happy to volunteer as a reviewer for SEV-related
>> changes so that I am CC'd on them and can help share the review burden with
>> whoever does maintain this code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Note: because there's no maintainer entry, when running
>> ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl on target/i386/sev.c, my name and the qemu
>> mailing list is the only thing that shows up... it doesn't even show
>> previous committers (as it would before applying this patch). Which is
>> probably not great considering I do not make pull requests to QEMU.
>>
>> Is the way forward to get someone to sign up as a maintainer before
>> applying a patch like this?
> 
> There's no requirement to have a maintainer before having a reviewer.
> If any of the existing committers shown do send pull requests, it is
> probably co-incidental since they're not listed as official maintainers,
> and being listed as Reviewer doesn't commit you to doing pull requests.
> 
> That said if you're the only nominated reviewer and actually do useful
> reviews, you will probably quickly find yourself the defacto maintainer
> in 12 months time and end up doing pull requests... 

Right, I am just worried that if I am the only person that shows up in
the get_maintainer.pl output, the submitter will have to know some other
way who a relevant maintainer is that can take the patches otherwise
they won't be CC'd. Or we'll have to hope a relevant maintainer sees
them on the list. Or I'll have to chase down a maintainer myself
assuming the reviews all check out. :-)

Connor